Page 144 - 20dynamics of cancer
P. 144

THEORY II                                                   129

                              Figure 7.5 uses n = 7 stages; Figure 7.6 provides similar plots but with
                              n = 10 stages.
                                In summary, a mutant genotype that increases transition rates will
                              cause a rise in ΔLLA when compared with the wild type. This increase in
                              ΔLLA occurs even though the number of rate-limiting stages is the same
                              for mutant and wild-type genotypes. The amount of the rise with age in
                              ΔLLA depends most strongly on the increase in transition rates caused
                              by the mutant and on the number of independent lines of progression
                              in the tissue.

                                                       CONCLUSIONS
                                The ratio of normal to mutant incidence provides one of the best tests
                              for the role of genetics in progression dynamics. Figures 7.3 and 7.4
                              show predictions for this ratio under simple assumptions about pro-
                              gression. Similar predictions could be derived by analyzing the ratio
                              of incidences in other models of progression, such as those developed
                              in earlier sections. In Chapter 8, I analyze data on the observed ratio
                              of incidences between normal and mutant genotypes. Those ratio tests
                              provide the most compelling evidence available that particular inherited
                              mutations reduce the number of rate-limiting stages in progression.

                                               7.3 Continuous Genetic and
                                              Environmental Heterogeneity

                                Quantitative traits include attributes such as height and weight that
                              can differ by small amounts between individuals, leading to nearly con-
                              tinuous trait values in large groups (Lynch and Walsh 1998). All quan-
                              titative traits vary in populations. With regard to cancer, studies have
                              demonstrated wide variability in DNA repair efficacy (Berwick and Vineis
                              2000; Mohrenweiser et al. 2003), which influences the rate of progres-
                              sion. Probably all other factors that determine the rate of progression
                              vary significantly between individuals.
                                Variation in quantitative traits stems from genetic differences and
                              from environmental differences. The genetic side arises mainly from
                              polymorphisms at multiple genetic loci that contribute to inherited poly-
                              genic variability. The environmental side includes all nongenetic factors
                              that influence variability, such as diet, lifestyle, exposure to carcinogens,
                              and so on.
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149