Page 192 - 20dynamics of cancer
P. 192

CARCINOGENS                                                 177

                                100 (a)                          (b)
                                Relative risk  75

                                 50

                                 25

                                    0     10    20     30    40 0      10    20     30     40
                                                              Dose


                              Figure 9.5  Relative risk, S, in response to dose, d. The plots show dose varying
                              from 0 to 40, to illustrate roughly the range of dosage in number of cigarettes
                              per day. However, the consequences of dose always depend only on bd, where
                              b scales the dose into the actual effect. So the absolute dosage level does not
                              matter, but the size of the interval does. (a) In this function, risk saturates
                              to a maximum level, S m = 100, at high dose for bd > 1, with S = 1 + (S m −
                                    n
                              1)(bd) (n + 1 − nbd) for bd < 1. For all curves, n = 6. The curves, from
                              left to right, show values of b = 0.1, 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 0.025. (b) In this function,
                                        n
                              S = (1 + bd) , with all parameters as in panel (a).


                              a saturating response to high dose, above which relative risk no longer
                              increases. In the right panel, risk continues to accelerate with increasing
                              dose.
                                Figure 9.6 illustrates how heterogeneity affects the aggregate dose-
                              response pattern in the population. In panel (a), the short-dash curve
                              shows the dose-response pattern when there is essentially no hetero-
                              geneity. Increasing heterogeneity alters the shape of the dose-response
                              curve, illustrated by the long-dash and solid curves of panel (a).
                                Figure 9.6b shows the log-log slopes of the aggregate dose-response
                              curves, obtained by calculating the slopes of the curves in the panel
                              above. These slopes provide the standard estimates for r, the exponent
                              on dose in the dose-response relationship.
                                Figure 9.7 shows the same calculations, but for a base response curve
                              that does not saturate at higher doses. In this case, heterogeneity always
                              increases the slope of the dose-response curve.
                                The consequences of heterogeneity follow general rules. When the
                              base curve rises at an increasing rate, then heterogeneity causes an in-
                              crease in value because, at each point, the average of higher and lower
                              doses is greater than the value at that point. By contrast, when the base
                              curve rises at a decreasing rate, then heterogeneity causes a decrease in
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197