Page 59 - Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients
P. 59
Herzog 1999 (Continued)
Uninterpretable results reported? Yes No uninterpretable results were present.
All tests
Withdrawals explained? Yes 55 eligible patients participated; 2 were ex-
All tests cluded for unstable angina before sched-
uled testing; 3 underwent DSE and sub-
sequently declined coronary angiography;
50 patients completed the research proto-
col. 39/50 patients qualified for DSE by the
prespecified inclusion criterion of ESKD
secondary to diabetic nephropathy (regard-
less of exercise capacity). The remaining 11
patients were unable to perform treadmill
exercise because of peripheral vascular dis-
ease (4 patients), musculoskeletal disease (4
patients), lung disease (1 patient), and gen-
eralised fatigue (2 patients)
Jassal 2007
Clinical features and settings Clinical features
• Between 2004 and 2006, 30 patients were prospectively evaluated who
underwent both DSE and coronary angiography. This population included 12 patients
(5 male, mean age 59 ± 13 years) referred to rule out CAD with normal kidney
function (Cr < 2.0 mg/dL) and 18 patients (8 male, mean age 55 ± 12 years) with
CKD (Cr > 2.0 mg/dL) on haemodialysis referred for pre-renal transplant workup.
Setting
• Boniface General Hospital, Manitoba, Canada
Participants • Number: 18
• DM: 38%
• Angina pectoris: percentage not reported
• Hypertension: 77%
• Sex: 44% male
Study design Cross sectional study
Target condition and reference standard(s) Coronary artery stenosis measured by coronary angiography
• Criterion for positive test results was ≥ 50% reduction in cross sectional area.
Index and comparator tests DSE
• Beta-adrenergic blocking agents were withdrawn for 24 hours before the study.
• Dobutamine was infused at doses of 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg/min for 3
minutes each. Images were analysed using the standard16-segment model
Follow-up None reported
Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipients (Review) 57
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.