Page 505 - An Evidence Review of Active Surveillance in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

Appendix Table C4.2. Comparison between watchful waiting and radical prostatectomy (continued)
Author, Year Study name Comparison Outcome Followup Sample size Results Factors included in the
[Pubmed ID] /Database definition/ (yr) per group model
measurement
Study design instrument
Lubeck 227 CaPSURE Observation vs. HRQoL Immediate Observation: Estimates are means (SE) Treatment group
1999 RP questionnaire post- 87 based on linear mixed interaction with time,
9886609 composed of treatment RP: 351 model for Observation vs. age, time of treatment.
items from the period RP:
Prospective RAND-36 item regression Physical functioning, 74.9 P values for
cohort Health Survey. estimates (2.6); 73.5 (1.3) comparisons between
All scales were Role-physical, 61.7 (4.5); treatment groups NR.
scored 0 to 34.3 (2.3)
100; optimal Role-emotional, 72.6 (3.9);
health or 68.6 (2.0)
functioning = Emotional well-being, 76.4
100. (1.7); 79.3 (0.9)
Bodily pain, 73.4 (2.4); 73.0
(1.3)
Social functioning, 80.9
(2.5); 67.2 (1.3)
Energy/fatigue, 61.5 (2.2);
58.4 (1.1)
General health perception,
60.4 (2.3); 76.0 (1.2)
Health change, 38.1 (2.7);
42.5 (1.4)
Health distress, 77.3 (2.1);
76.3 (1.1)
Self-esteem, 82.1 (1.9); 82.4
(1.0)

C-170