Page 432 - An Evidence Review of Active Surveillance in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer

Appendix Table C3.2. KQ3 multivariable analyses (continued)
Author Factors Data source Duration Analyzed Population WW/AS Methods Results as described in paper
yr sample characteristics definitions
PMI
- ≥2 vs. 0, RR=0.67 (CI 0.54,
0.83)

compared to RT + ADT
1. Age, 0.90 (CI 0.90-0.91);
P<0.001
2. Black vs. white, RR 0.39 (CI
0.31-0.50)
3. Urban vs. rural, RT RR 1.48 (CI
1.18-1.85)
4. SES highest vs lowest quintile,
RT RR=1.52 (CI 1.26-1.84)
5. Grade poor vs. well
differentiated, RT RR=2.34 (CI
1.78-3.08)
6. Comorbidity 2+ vs. 0, RR=0.80
(CI 0.67-0.96)
7. Comorbidity,
- 1 vs. 0, RR=1.11 (CI 0.96, 1.28)
- ≥2 vs. 0, RR=0.67 (CI 0.54,
0.83)

Additional information is provided
in Table 2 of the paper for the
comparison of ADT monotherapy
vs. WW.

All estimates were adjusted for
SEER region.

C-134