Page 80 - 15Diarrhoeaandvomiting
P. 80

Fluid management




                           There  were  285  cases  and  728  controls.  After  controlling  for  confounding  factors  (lack  of
                           maternal  education,  history  of  vomiting,  high  stool  frequency,  young  age  and  infection  with
                           Vibrio cholerae), the risk of dehydration was five times higher in infants whose mothers stopped
                           breastfeeding compared with infants whose mothers continued to breastfeed following the onset
                           of diarrhoea (OR 5.23; 95% CI 1.37 to 9.99; P = 0.016). Similarly, the risk of dehydration was
                           1.5 times higher in infants who did not receive any ORT at home compared with those who
                           received plentiful ORT (total volume ≥ 250 ml) (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.29; P = 0.019).
                           Infants receiving smaller amounts of ORT (≤ 250 ml) before admission had an 18% higher risk
                           of dehydration compared with those receiving plentiful ORT, but the risk was not statistically
                           significant (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.66; P = 0.343).

                           Evidence summary

                           Evidence  from  a  case–control  study  [EL  =  2+]  indicated  that  cessation  of  breastfeeding  in
                           children with gastroenteritis was associated with an increased risk of dehydration. This study
                           also suggested that oral fluid supplementation begun at home and given in good quantity was
                           associated with a reduced risk of dehydration.

                           GDG translation from evidence to recommendation

                           Evidence,  though  limited,  suggests  that  continued  breastfeeds  and  provision  of  oral  fluid
                           supplementation  to  children  with  gastroenteritis  reduces  the  risk  of  dehydration. The  lack  of
                           available evidence was not surprising, given the ethical difficulties with undertaking an RCT
                           comparing the administration and withholding of oral fluid supplementation. Given that oral
                           fluids are effective in the management of the dehydrated child, as discussed in Section 5.2, the
                           GDG considered that it was reasonable to assume that liberal fluid supplementation is effective
                           in the prevention of dehydration. While it was recognised that some children may prefer other
                           oral  fluids,  ORS  solution  has  advantages  (Section  5.3)  and  so  should  be  used  if  possible  for
                           children at increased risk of dehydration (Section 4.1).

                            Recommendation on primary prevention of dehydration

                            In children with gastroenteritis but without clinical dehydration:
                            •  continue breastfeeding and other milk feeds
                            •  encourage fluid intake
                            •  discourage the drinking of fruit juices and carbonated drinks, especially in those at
                              increased risk of dehydration
                            •  offer oral rehydration salt (ORS) solution as supplemental fluid to those at increased risk of
                              dehydration.

               5.2         Treating dehydration


                           Clinical question
                           How do ORT and IVT compare in terms of safety and efficacy in the treatment of dehydration?
                           In order to address this question, a systematic literature search was undertaken that led to 363
                           articles and abstracts being identified. Of these, 27 articles were retrieved in hard copy for review.
                           Most of the retrieved studies were RCTs and their results had been pooled in a systematic review
                                                                                                           83
                           discussed below. In addition to the systematic review, another RCT conducted in children with
                                           84
                           severe dehydration  was included. The evidence was considered in three categories:
                           •  ORT versus IVT for children with all degrees and types of dehydration
                           •  ORT versus IVT for children with severe dehydration
                           •  ORT versus IVT for children with hypernatraemic dehydration.
                           Some of the trials included in the systematic review had compared the effectiveness of ORT with
                           IVT in children with severe dehydration and also hypernatraemic dehydration. Those trials were
                           considered separately under the relevant categories.




                                                                                                          55
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85