Page 549 - untitled
P. 549

520                      Dissenting Statement


              Established in 1934, now a part of HUD and administered by the Federal
         Housing Administrator (who is also the Assistant Secretary of Housing), FHA
         insures 100 percent of an eligible mortgage. It was established to provide fi nancing
         to people who could not meet the standards for a bank-originated conventional
         loan. Th  e loans it insured had a maximum LTV of 80 percent in 1934. Th  is went to
                                           139
         95 percent in 1950, and 97 percent in 1961.  With its maximum LTV remaining at
         97 percent, FHA maintained average FICO scores for its borrowers just below 660
         from 1996 to 2006. During this period, the average FICO score for a conventional
                                          140
         subprime borrower was somewhat lower.  Beginning in 1993, shortly aft er Fannie
         and Freddie were introduced as competitors, FHA began to increase its percentage
         of loans with low downpayments. Th  is had the predictable eff ect on its delinquency
         rates, as shown in the fi gure below prepared by Edward Pinto with data from FHA,
         the FDIC, and the MBA:
                                       Figure 6.



























              Despite its reductions in required downpayments, FHA’s market share vis-a
         vis the GSEs began to decline. According to GAO data, in 1996, FHA’s market
         share among lower-income borrowers was 26 percent while the GSEs’ share was
         23.8 percent. By 2005, FHA’s share was 9.8 percent, while the GSEs’ share was 31.9
         percent. It appears that early on Fannie Mae deliberately targeted FHA borrowers
         with its Community Homebuyer Program (CHBP). In a memorandum prepared
         in 1993, Fannie’s Credit Policy group compared Fannie’s then-proposed CHBP
         program to FHA’s requirements under its 1-to-4 family loan program (Section
         203(b)) and showed that most of Fannie’s requirements were competitive or better.

         139   Kerry D. Vandell, “FHA Restructuring Proposals: Alternatives and Implications,” Fannie Mae Housing
         Policy Debate, vol. 6, Issue 2, 1995, pp. 308-309
         140   GAO, “Federal Housing Administration: Decline in Agency’s Market Share Was Associated with
         Product and Process Developments of Other Mortgage Market Participants,” GAO-07-645, June 2007,
         pp. 42 and 44.
   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554