Page 17 - 81Sulfonation-Sulfation Processing Technology for Anionic Surfactant Manufacture_opt
P. 17

284                                               Advances in Chemical Engineering













            Fig. 17. Reactions in the aging step (adapted from Roberts, 2001)
                                                    B 
                                                      
                                             k   Ae   T                         (20)

                                               k f, (s -1 )            k s, (s -1 )
             LogA                              12,10                    11,52
             B                                 12,060                  12,130
            Table 4. Values for equation 20 on aging stage (Roberts, 2008)

            The overall conversion as function of time and mole ratio M of SO 3/ME is given by:
                                                1        f k t  
                             % conversion   100M       0.25e    0.167e  s k t  (21)
                                                M 100 

            M 100 is mole ratio for a conversion at 100%, after a delayed aging M 100 = 1,2. These equations,
            for aging  in a batch reactor system  or in a plug  flow systems, can be used  as  guidelines
            when setting  initial conditions  before fine-tuning  plant  operation to  meet  a required
            specification (Roberts, 1998). Methyl esters  are less  active  than aromatic  compounds  to
            sulfonating  due to  the less  electronic  density  of the aliphatic  chains. The methyl ester
            sulfonation include a  neutralization step  to  obtain monosodium  salts  of   -sulfo  methyl
            esters as desire products (Kapur et al. 1978). If neutralization is immediate disodium salt is
            formed  (see Figure 18a). However, if neutralization of the acid  is  delayed, the sulfo  ester
            monodisodium salt is obtained as final product (see Figure 18b).

















            Fig. 18. Neutralization chemistry of SME (Torres et al., 2009b)





             www.intechopen.com
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22