Page 14 - Climate Change Impacts in the United States

7: FORESTS
RefeRences

41. USFS, 2012: Future of America’s forest and rangelands: 2010 Harden, J. W., S. E. Trumbore, B. J. Stocks, A. Hirsch, S. T. Gower,
Resources Planning Act assessment. General Technical Report K. P. O’Neill, and E. S. Kasischke, 2000: The role of fire in the
WO-87. 198 pp., U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest boreal carbon budget. Global Change Biology, 6, 174-184, doi:10.1046/
Service, Washington, D.C. [Available online at http://www.fs.fed. j.1365-2486.2000.06019.x. [Available online at http://onlinelibrary.
us/research/publications/gtr/gtr_wo87.pdf] wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06019.x/pdf]

42. Sohngen, B., and S. Brown, 2006: The influence of conversion of 50. Albaugh, T. J., H. Lee Allen, P. M. Dougherty, and K. H.
forest types on carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services Johnsen, 2004: Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to
in the South Central United States. Ecological Economics, 57, 698-708, optimal nutrient and water resource availability. Forest Ecology and
doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.06.001. Management, 192, 3-19, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.002.

43. Choi, S. W., B. Sohngen, and R. Alig, 2011: An assessment of Albaugh, T. J., H. Lee Allen, B. R. Zutter, and H. E. Quicke, 2003:
the influence of bioenergy and marketed land amenity values on Vegetation control and fertilization in midrotation Pinus taeda
land uses in the Midwestern US. Ecological Economics, 70, 713-720, stands in the southeastern United States. Annals of Forest Science, 60,
doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.005. 619-624, doi:10.1051/forest:2003054.

44. Daigneault, A., B. Sohngen, and R. Sedjo, 2012: An economic Allen, H. L., 2008: Ch. 6: Silvicultural treatments to enhance
approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy. productivity. The Forests Handbook, Volume 2: Applying Forest Science
Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 5664-5671, doi:10.1021/ for Sustainable Management, J. Evans, Ed., Blackwell Science Ltd, 129-
es2030142. 139.

45. DOE, 2011: U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Amishev, D. Y., and T. R. Fox, 2006: The effect of weed control
Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. ORNL/TM-2011-224. R. D. and fertilization on survival and growth of four pine species in
Perlack, and B. J. Stokes, Eds., 227 pp., U.S. Department of Energy, the Virginia Piedmont. Forest Ecology and Management, 236, 93-101,
Office of the Biomass Program, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.339.
Oak Ridge, TN. [Available online at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/
biomass/pdfs/billion_ton_update.pdf] Borders, B. E., R. E. Will, D. Markewitz, A. Clark, R. Hendrick,
R. O. Teskey, and Y. Zhang, 2004: Effect of complete competition
46. Running, S. W., R. R. Nemani, F. A. Heinsch, M. Zhao, M. Reeves, control and annual fertilization on stem growth and canopy
and H. Hashimoto, 2004: A continuous satellite-derived measure relations for a chronosequence of loblolly pine plantations in the
of global terrestrial primary production. BioScience, 54, 547-560, lower coastal plain of Georgia. Forest Ecology and Management, 192,
doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0547:ACSMOG]2.0.CO;2. 21-37. [Available online at http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/
[Available online at http://ecocast.arc.nasa.gov/pubs/pdfs/2004/ ja_borders001.pdf]
Running_Bioscience.pdf]
Nilsson, U., and H. L. Allen, 2003: Short-and long-term effects
47. Sathre, R., and J. O’Connor, 2010: Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas of site preparation, fertilization and vegetation control on growth
displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environmental and stand development of planted loblolly pine. Forest Ecology and
Science & Policy, 13, 104-114, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005. Management, 175, 367-377, doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00140-8.
[Available online at http://www.fsl.orst.edu/ltep/Biscuit/Biscuit_
48. CCSP, 2007: The First State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR): The files/Refs/Niellson%20FEM2003%20neg%20herb%20effect.
North American Carbon Budget and Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle. pdf]
A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee
on Global Change Research. U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis 51. Balboa-Murias, M. Á., R. Rodríguez-Soalleiro, A. Merino,
and Assessment Product 2.2. A. W. King, L. Dilling, G. P. Zimmerman, and J. G. Álvarez-González, 2006: Temporal variations and
D. M. Fairman, R. A. Houghton, G. H. Marland, A. Z. Rose, and distribution of carbon stocks in aboveground biomass of radiata
T. J. Wilbanks, Eds. Climate Change Science Program, 242 pp. pine and maritime pine pure stands under different silvicultural
[Available online at http://cdiac.ornl.gov/SOCCR/pdf/sap2-2- alternatives. Forest Ecology and Management, 237, 29-38, doi:10.1016/j.
final-all.pdf] foreco.2006.09.024.

49. Balshi, M. S., A. D. McGuire, P. Duffy, M. Flannigan, D. W. Harmon, M. E., and B. Marks, 2002: Effects of silvicultural
Kicklighter, and J. Melillo, 2009: Vulnerability of carbon storage practices on carbon stores in Douglas-fir-western hemlock forests
in North American boreal forests to wildfires during the 21st in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.: Results from a simulation model.
century. Global Change Biology, 15, 1491-1510, doi:10.1111/j.1365- Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 863-877, doi:10.1139/x01-
2486.2009.01877.x. 216. [Available online at http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/
abs/10.1139/x01-216]
188 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE UNITED STATES