Page 18 - Climate Change Impacts in the United States
P. 18

7: FORESTS
                                                                                                TRaceable accounTs

          fectively detect the location and intensity of disturbances (http://  more frequently. 16,23,25  This is based on the strong relationships
                                                                                                              17
          www.ntsg.umt.edu/project/mgdi). Moderate severity disturbance   between climate and forest response, shown observationally  and
                                                                           22
          is mapped in orange and represents a 65%-100% divergence of   experimentally.  Expected responses will increase substantially
          the current-year MODIS Global Disturbance Index value from the   to warming and also in conjunction with other changes such as
          range of natural variability, High severity disturbance (in red) sig-  an increase in the frequency and/or severity of drought and am-
          nals a divergence of over 100%. 7                    plification of pest and pathogen impacts. Eastern forests are less
                                                               likely to experience immediate increases in wildfire unless/until a
          New information and remaining uncertainties          point is reached at which warmer temperatures, concurrent with
          Forest disturbances have large ecosystem effects, but high interan-  seasonal dry periods or more protracted drought, trigger wildfires.
          nual variability in regional fire and insect activity makes detection
          of trends more difficult than for changes in mean conditions. 20,21,70   Key message #2 Traceable accounT
          Therefore, there is generally less confidence in assessment of fu-  U.S. forests and associated wood products cur-
          ture projections of disturbance events than for mean conditions   rently absorb and  store the  equivalent of  about
                                                     21
          (for example, growth under slightly warmer conditions).    16% of all carbon dioxide  (CO2) emitted by fossil
                                                               fuel burning in the U.S. each year. Climate change,
          There are insufficient data on trends in windthrow, ice storms,   combined with current societal trends in land use
          hurricanes, and landslide-inducing storms to infer that these types   and forest management, is projected to reduce this
          of disturbance events are changing.                  rate of forest CO2 uptake.

          Factors affecting tree death, such as drought, warmer tempera-  Description of evidence base
          tures, and/or pests and pathogens are often interrelated, which   The key message and supporting text summarizes extensive evi-
          means that isolating a single cause of mortality is rare. 11,12,13,17,22,68  dence documented in the TIR, “Effects of Climatic Variability and
                                                               Change on Forest Ecosystems: A Comprehensive Science Synthe-
                                                                                       1
          Assessment of confidence based on evidence           sis for the U.S. Forest Sector.”  Technical input reports (58) on a
          Very High. There is very high confidence that under projected   wide range of topics were also received and reviewed as part of the
          climate changes there is high risk (high risk = high probability   Federal Register Notice solicitation for public input.
          and high consequence) that western forests in the United States
                                                                           3
          will be affected increasingly by large and intense fires that occur   A recent study  has shown that forests are a big sink of CO2 na-
                                                               tionally. However, the permanence of this carbon sink is contin-
                       Confidence Level                        gent on forest disturbance rates, which are changing, and on eco-
                                                                                                                 56
                                                               nomic conditions that may accelerate harvest of forest biomass.
                              Very High                        Market response can cause changes in the carbon source/sink
                       Strong evidence (established            dynamics through shifts in forest age, 39,40  land-use changes and
                                                                                               41
                                                                                                                 42
                       theory, multiple sources, con-          urbanization that reduce forested areas,  forest type changes,
                      sistent results, well documented         and bioenergy development changing forest management. 41,43,44,45
                       and accepted methods, etc.),
                            high consensus                     Additionally, publications have reported that fires can convert a
                                                                                            25
                                                               forest into a shrubland or meadow,  with frequent fires perma-
                                High                                                     49
                                                               nently reducing the carbon stock.
                        Moderate evidence (several
                        sources, some consistency,             New information and remaining uncertainties
                      methods vary and/or documen-
                        tation limited, etc.), medium          That economic factors and societal choices will affect future carbon
                              consensus                        cycle of forests is known with certainty; the major uncertainties
                               Medium                          come from the future economic picture, accelerating disturbance
                                                               rates, and societal responses to those dynamics.
                        Suggestive evidence (a few
                       sources, limited consistency,
                       models incomplete, methods              Assessment of confidence based on evidence
                        emerging, etc.), competing             Based on the evidence and uncertainties, confidence is high that
                           schools of thought                  climate change, combined with current societal trends regarding
                                Low                            land use and forest management, is projected to reduce forest
                        Inconclusive evidence (lim-            CO2  uptake  in the U.S.  The U.S. has already seen large-scale
                       ited sources, extrapolations,           shifts in forest cover due to interactions between forestland use
                      inconsistent findings, poor docu-        and agriculture (for example, between the onset of European
                       mentation and/or methods not            settlement to the present). There are competing demands for how
                       tested, etc.), disagreement or
                      lack of opinions among experts           forestland  is used  today. The  future role of U.S. forests  in the

                                                            192                     CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE UNITED STATES
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20