Page 223 - An Evidence Review of Active Surveillance in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
P. 223

Appendix Table C1.2. Trends in prostate cancer incidence rates (per 100,000 unless otherwise stated) (continued)
 Author   Database   Groups   1980-84  1985-89   1990-94   1995-99   2000-04   2005-  Statistical   Notes
 Year                                        10        analysis
 PMID
 21
 Farkas    SEER   White         Peak,                  NR
 1998          +0.56
 9730458         (1991)
       Start of
    decline,
 Black   −0.20
    (1993)
 [Rate of increase
 in moderately   Peak,
 differentiated   +0.47
 disease incidence   (1991)
 per 100,000   Start of
 persons]   decline,
  −0.15
  (1994)

 42
 Shao    SEER   2-4      56.2 (0.7)      24.9 (0.5)      2.3   -53.9
 2009    5-7   88.8 (0.9)   167.3 (1.2)      (0.1)     (P<0.001)
 19713548   8-10   47.5 (0.7)   50.7 (0.7)   193.3     104.5
 Per 100,000 (SD),   (1988-89)   (1996-97)   (1.2)     (P<0.001)
 age-adjusted to                             38.3      -9.2
 the 2000 US                                 (0.5)     (P<0.001)
 standard                                    (2004-
 population in 5-yr                          05)       [absolute
 age increments                                        change
 beginning at 25                                       between
 yr.                                                   1988-1989
                                                       and 2004-05
                                                       (p-values
                                                       from ANOVA
                                                       with linear
                                                       contrast)]
 52
 Schwartz    SEER-  Well diff.   28.2      NR   12.2         NR         Additional
 1999   Detroit   Moderately diff.   22.8   122.9   ~100                information
 10197854   Poorly diff.   NR   NR   NR                                 is provided
    Age-adjusted   (1982)   (1993)   (1996)                             in Figure 2
 incidence rate                                                         of the paper








 C-29
   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228