Page 175 - 80 guidelines for the treatment of malaria_opt
P. 175

ANNEX 8. Treatment of severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria



           was no significant difference between the two groups in mean fever clearance time, coma
           recovery time and parasite clearance time (fever clearance time 31 h compared with 36 h;
           coma recovery time 21 h compared with 26 h; parasite clearance time 36 h compared
           with 41 h; P values not reported for any comparison).

           Harms
           The two systematic reviews (6, 7) and one of the subsequent RCTs (4) found no significant
           difference in neurological sequelae between the artemether and quinine groups (systematic
           reviews, see the Benefits section; subsequent trial 3/51 (6%) with artemether, 1/54 (2%)
           with quinine, RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.34–29.56). However, in the first review, rates for the
           combined outcome of death or neurological sequelae were lower for artemether than for
           quinine (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.96, P = 0.02) (6).

           The second subsequent RCT found that one child treated with quinine developed
           hypoglycaemia (0/20 (0%) with artemether, 1/21 (5%) with quinine (9). It reported no
           neurological problems in either treatment group after 28 days of follow-up.
           The third subsequent RCT found no significant difference in transient neurological
           sequelae between the artemether and quinine groups (2/38 (5%) compared with 1/39
           (3%) (10).

           comment

           The third subsequent randomized controlled trial did not use loading doses of either
           artemether or quinine at the beginning of treatment (10). There was a fourth subsequent
           RCT (52 people); however, it was not clear whether the participants had severe malaria
           and the outcomes were poorly reported.





           a8.5   Question:
                 Pre-referral treatment with rectal artesunate: should rectal artesunate be used   A8
                 in preference to quinine?

           summary

           There are no data from trials with sufficient statistical power to assess differences in
           mortality following treatment with rectal artesunate and quinine in people with moderate
           or severe malaria. The objective of the trials that have been conducted was to establish the
           safety and efficacy of rectal artesunate as pre-referral treatment where there is no access
           to parenteral treatment. Comparisons between rectal artesunate and IV artesunate or
           IV and IM quinine have been carried out to assess parasitological and clinical response
           in the 12 or 24 h immediately after treatment (11, 12).
                                                                                      161
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180