Page 174 - 80 guidelines for the treatment of malaria_opt
P. 174

nd
              Guidelines for the treatment of malaria – 2  edition


            Benefits
            Two systematic reviews (6,7) and three subsequent RCTs (8–10). The first review (search
            date not reported, seven RCTs, 1919 adults and children) analysed individual participant
            data (6). It found no significant difference in mortality between IM artemether and
            quinine given by IV infusion or IM injection (the latter in one RCT only) in severe
            falciparum malaria (mortality 136/961 (14%) with artemether, 164/958 (17%) with quinine;
            odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.62–1.02). Parasite clearance was faster with artemether than
            with quinine (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.56–0.69). The review found no significant difference
            in the speed of coma recovery, fever clearance time or neurological sequelae between
            artemether and quinine (coma recovery time OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97–1.22; fever clearance
            time OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90–1.15; neurological sequelae, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59–1.15).
            The second review (search date: 1999, 11 RCTs, 2142 people) found a small significant
            reduction in mortality for IM artemether compared with IV quinine (OR 0.72, 95% CI
            0.57–0.91) (7). However, more rigorous analysis excluding three poorer quality trials found
            no significant difference in mortality (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.59–1.05). The review found no
            significant difference in neurological sequelae at recovery between the artemether and
            quinine groups (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.52–1.25).
            The first subsequent RCT (105 people aged 15–40 years with cerebral malaria in
            Bangladesh) compared IM artemether (160 mg initially, then 80 mg/kg once daily)
            with IV quinine (loading dose 20 mg/kg, then 10 mg/kg every 8 h) (8). It found no
            significant difference in death rates between the artemether and quinine groups (9/51
            (18%) compared with 10/54 (19%), OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.35–2.55). Mean fever clearance
            time and coma recovery time were significantly longer for artemether than for quinine
            (fever clearance time 58 h compared with 47 h, WMD 11.0 h, 95% CI 1.6–20.4 h; coma
            recovery time 74 h compared with 53 h, WMD 20.8 h, 95% CI 3.6–38.0 h). There was no
            significant difference in mean parasite clearance time between artemether and quinine
            (52 h compared with 61 h, WMD −8.6 h, 95% CI −22.5 h to +5.3 h).

            The second subsequent RCT (41 children with severe malaria in Sudan, 40 analysed)
            compared IM artemether (3.2 mg/kg loading dose, then 1.6 mg/kg once a day) with IV
            quinine (loading dose 20 mg/kg, then 10 mg/kg every 8 h) (11). It found that artemether
            significantly increased fever clearance time but found no significant difference between
            artemether and quinine in time to parasite clearance (mean fever clearance time 30.5 h
            with artemether, 18 h with quinine, P = 0.02; mean parasite clearance time 16 h compared
            with 22.4 h, P > 0.05). There were no deaths in the artemether group, one child died with
            quinine (0/20 (0%) compared with 1/21 (5%), P value not reported).
            The third subsequent RCT (77 comatose children aged 3 months–15 years with cerebral
            malaria) compared IM artemether (1.6 mg/kg every 12 h) with IV quinine (10 mg/kg
            every 8 h) (10). It found no significant difference in death rates between the artemether
            and quinine groups (3/38 (8%) compared with 2/39 (5%), P value not reported). There

   160
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179