Page 166 - untitled
P. 166

THE CDO MACHINE                                               


         CDOs, and leverage, Cioffi’s funds earned healthy returns for a time: the High-Grade
                                                                  
         fund had returns of  in ,  in , and  in  after fees. Cioffi and
         Tannin made millions before the hedge funds collapsed in . Cioffi was rewarded
         with total compensation worth more than  million from  to . In ,
         the year the two hedge funds filed for bankruptcy, Cioffi made more than . mil-
         lion in total compensation. Matt Tannin, his lead manager, was awarded compensa-
                                                
         tion of more than . million from  to . Both managers invested some of
         their own money in the funds, and used this as a selling point when pitching the
         funds to others. 
           But when house prices fell and investors started to question the value of mort-
         gage-backed securities in , the same short-term leverage that had inflated Cioffi’s
         returns would amplify losses and quickly put his two hedge funds out of business.

                            CITIGROUP’S LIQUIDITY PUTS:
                         “A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST”
         By the middle of the decade, Citigroup was a market leader in selling CDOs, often
         using its depositor-based commercial bank to provide liquidity support. For much of
         this period, the company was in various types of trouble with its regulators, and
         then-CEO Charles Prince told the FCIC that dealing with those troubles took up
                           
         more than half his time. After paying the  million fine related to subprime mort-
         gage lending, Citigroup again got into trouble, charged with helping Enron—before
         that company filed for bankruptcy in —use structured finance transactions to
         manipulate its financial statements. In July , Citigroup agreed to pay the SEC
          million to settle these allegations and also agreed, under formal enforcement
         actions by the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, to
         overhaul its risk management practices. 
           By March , the Fed had seen enough: it banned Citigroup from making any
         more major acquisitions until it improved its governance and legal compliance. Ac-
         cording to Prince, he had already decided to turn “the company’s focus from an ac-
         quisition-driven strategy to more of a balanced strategy involving organic growth.” 
         Robert Rubin, a former treasury secretary and former Goldman Sachs co-CEO who
         was at that time chairman of the Executive Committee of Citigroup’s board of direc-
         tors, recommended that Citigroup increase its risk taking—assuming, he told the
         FCIC, that the firm managed those risks properly. 
           Citigroup’s investment bank subsidiary was a natural area for growth after the Fed
         and then Congress had done away with restrictions on activities that could be pur-
         sued by investment banks affiliated with commercial banks. One opportunity among
         many was the CDO business, which was just then taking off amid the booming mort-
         gage market.
           In , Citi’s CDO desk was a tiny unit in the company’s investment banking
         arm, “eight guys and a Bloomberg” terminal, in the words of Nestor Dominguez,
                             
         then co-head of the desk. Nevertheless, this tiny operation under the command of
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171