Page 168 - untitled
P. 168

THE CDO MACHINE                                               


         in commercial paper straight onto the bank’s balance sheet, requiring it to come up
         with  billion in cash as well as more capital to satisfy bank regulators.
            The liquidity puts were approved by Citigroup’s Capital Markets Approval Com-
                                                                  
         mittee, which was charged with reviewing all new financial products. Deeming
         them to be low risk, the company based its opinions on the credit risk of the underly-
         ing collateral, but failed to consider the liquidity risk posed by a general market
                  
         disruption. The OCC, the supervisor of Citigroup’s largest commercial bank sub -
                                                        
         sidiary, was aware that the bank had issued the liquidity puts. However, the terms of
         the OCC’s post-Enron enforcement action focused only on whether Citibank had a
         process in place to review the product, and not on the risks of the puts to Citibank’s
         balance sheet. 
            Besides Citigroup, only a few large financial institutions, such as AIG Financial
         Products, BNP, WestLB of Germany, and Société Générale of France, wrote signifi-
                                                                   
         cant amounts of liquidity puts on commercial paper issued by CDOs. Bank of
         America, the biggest commercial bank in the United States, wrote small deals
         through  but did  billion worth in , just before the market crashed. 
         When asked why other market participants were not writing liquidity puts,
         Dominguez stated that Société Générale and BNP were big players in that market.
         “You needed to be a bank with a strong balance sheet, access to collateral, and exist-
         ing relationships with collateral managers,” he said. 
                                                           
            The CDO desk stopped writing liquidity puts in early , when it reached its
         internal limits. Citibank’s treasury function had set a  billion cap on liquidity
             
         puts; it granted one final exception, bringing the total to  billion. Risk manage-
                                                               
         ment had also set a  billion risk limit on top-rated asset-backed securities, which
         included the liquidity puts. Later, in an October  memo, Citigroup’s Financial
         Control Group criticized the firm’s pricing of the puts, which failed to consider the
         risk that investors would not buy the commercial paper protected by the liquidity
                                                                       
         puts when it came due, thereby creating a  billion cash demand on Citibank. An
         undated and unattributed internal document (believed to have been drafted in )
         also questioned one of the practices of Citigroup’s investment bank, which paid
         traders on its CDO desk for generating the deals without regard to later losses:
         “There is a potential conflict of interest in pricing the liquidity put cheep [sic] so that
                                                                    
         more CDO equities can be sold and more structuring fee to be generated.” The re-
         sult would be losses so severe that they would help bring the huge financial conglom-
         erate to the brink of failure, as we will see.


                     AIG: “GOLDEN GOOSE FOR THE ENTIRE STREET”
         In , American International Group was the largest insurance company in the
         world as measured by stock market value: a massive conglomerate with  billion
         in assets, , employees in  countries, and  subsidiaries.
            But to Wall Street, AIG’s most valuable asset was its credit rating: that it was
         awarded the highest possible rating—Aaa by Moody’s since , AAA by S&P since
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173