Page 92 - Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary
P. 92

Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary


            eMeRGinG tooLS AnD StRAteGieS

            icons, including a self-calculating feature, and adding voice instructions
            and  results.  Clear  presentation  of  results  is  important.  For  example,  a
            person with limited literacy will find it easier to understand a message
            that says “Your blood sugar is too high” than one that provides a number
            that must be interpreted. Instructions should be clear and easy to follow,
            using simple print and video tutorials with illustrations for each step of
            use. One should avoid very small fonts and technical medical language,
            for instance. Critical components or warnings should be emphasized.
               Brach  concluded  by  saying  that,  in  thinking  about  the  future  it  is
            important to start incorporating literacy and health literacy considerations
            into the development of personal health records and ePrescribing.

                                      DISCuSSION

                                 George isham, M.D., M.S.
                                      HealthPartners
                                        Moderator

               One audience member said that many of her patients who use the
            Internet  have  difficulty  so  they  look  for  a  telephone  number  to  call  to
            obtain assistance. Yet, she said, it is usually not possible to find a tele-
            phone number. The audience member urged AHRQ to be careful about
            posting guidelines on telephone use if there is not someone available to
            receive calls. Brach agreed that it was important to have someone avail-
            able to answer calls.
               Another participant asked if Brach could elaborate on what she meant
            when  she  talked  about  making  information  culturally  relevant.  Brach
            responded that some of the things one might look for are whether the
            graphics are relevant to the population. Unfortunately, there is not a sci-
            ence base that one can point to and say, if one follows this checklist, one
            will be culturally competent. It is a very complex issue.
               Another audience member pointed out that there does not seem to be
            a consensus about what the three to five actionable items are that could
            lead to quality improvement in various areas. What is it that everyone
            needs  to  know  how  to  do  in  order  to  improve  diabetes  outcomes,  for
            example, or asthma outcomes? It is a great deal easier to build platforms
            for communicating if one agrees on the actionable points. Any leadership
            or guidance that AHRQ can provide on how to do a better job of coming
            up with some common consensus about what one needs to know about
            health literacy would be very helpful.
               Brach responded that AHRQ and those in the Department of Health
            and Human Services (HHS) working on healthfinder.gov have been in the
            process of building consensus on the top prevention and health promo-






                 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97