Page 299 - 16Neonatal Jaundice_compressed
P. 299

Neonatal jaundice


 Bibliographic details   Study type &   Patient characteristics   Test, Reference Standard,   Results   Reviewers Comments
 Evidence level   Threshold for a positive test
               Sensitivity: 97.1% (67/69)
               Specificity: 19.0% (33/174)
               PPV: 32.2% (67/208)
               NPV: 94.3% (33/35)


 Madlon-Kay DJ;   Study Type:   Newborn babies delivered in a hospital   1) Clinical assessment by nurses   TSB levels (micromol/litre)   Unselected population
    Diagnostic study   with follow-up visit at home by Home   with their usual method (e.g   All babies (n = 164)   Test & Reference test described
 Year: 2001      Health Nurses.   blanching skin, judging degree of   Mean (sd) 125 (80)   in detail
    Evidence Level:      yellowness with caudal   Range: 12 to 345   Test and reference test carried
 Country: USA   II   (n = 164,   progression, looking for jaundice at      out within one hour
       mean GA: Not reported   sclera, gums, nose)   Babies assessed to be jaundiced by nurses   Blinding – not specified
 59       mean BW: Not reported      (n = 82)   Data not extractable for
    mean age at assessment 6.4 ± 2.5 days)   2) Caudal progression of jaundice   Mean (sd): 180 (68.4)   calculating exact values of TP,
    alone as assessed by nurses               FP, TN & FN
 Gender: Not reported   Babies assessed not to be jaundiced by

 Ethnicity (nurse determination)   3) Ingram Icterometer reading from   nurses (n = 82)   Funding: Ramsey Foundation
 white = 60%   nose   Mean (sd): 72 (46)

 Threshold for diagnostic accuracy –
 black = 18%   reading > 2.5   Comparison 1:
 Asian = 6%
 Hispanic = 7%
 Other = 9%   Reference standard: Laboratory   Correlation of estimated TSB levels with lab
               TSB (Pearson correlation coefficient, n = 82
 TSB levels within 1 hr
               where sampling done)
 Exclusion: babies who were in intensive
 care nursery or received phototherapy,   r = 0.61, P < 0.01
 Also babies whose mothers lived more
 than 10 miles from hospital or were not
 proficient in English   Comparison 2:

               Correlation of estimated TSB levels with lab
 Babies examined by 12 home health   TSB (Pearson correlation coefficient, n = 82
 nurses.
               where sampling done)
               r = 0.47, P < 0.01

               Accuracy of test (caudal progression to
               nipple line) in detecting TSB
               > 205 micromol/litre (N = Not reported)
               Sensitivity: 76%
               Specificity: 60%

               Comparison 3:

               Correlation of estimated TSB levels with lab
               TSB (Pearson correlation coefficient, n = 82
               where sampling done)
               r = 0.48, P < 0.01

               Accuracy of test in detecting TSB


 222
   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304