Page 9 - 81Sulfonation-Sulfation Processing Technology for Anionic Surfactant Manufacture_opt
P. 9

276                                               Advances in Chemical Engineering

            flow by  using  eddy  diffusivity  parameter. The eddy  diffusivity  models  proposed  by
            Lamourelle & Sandall (1972) for the outer region and modified by van Driest (1956) for the
            region near the wall were used. Effects of interfacial drag at the gas–liquid interface and
            the gas–phase  heat  and  mass  transfer resistance have  also  been considered  in the
            proposed model. The model takes into account the variations of physical properties with
            temperature and  predicts  conversion profiles, gas–liquid  interface temperature in the
            axial direction, and average liquid film thickness along the reactor length. Knowledge of
            temperature distribution along  with the reactor is  important  for the  product  quality
            control,  since for  highly  exothermic  reactions  under certain  conditions  can  produce
            degradation of the products. The equations described in the following section account for
            the mass,  momentum  and  heat  transfer.  In  the development  of these equations  was
            considered  the turbulent  diffusivity  for mass  transfer coupled  with chemical  reaction,
            according to the theory of Yih & Seagrave (1978), and with heat transfer according with
            Yih & Liu (1983).

            Finally some additional assumptions were made for the mathematical model:
            i.   No entrainments of liquid droplets into gas or of gas bubbles into the liquid film occur;
            ii.  Fully developed film (entrance and exit effects to reactor are neglected);
            iii.  The liquid film is symmetric with respect to the reactor axis.

            According  with these assumptions  the mathematical model is  showed  in the following
            sections.

            4.1 Mass balance
            Only three components are considered in the liquid phase: organic liquid, acid product and
            sulfonating  reagent,   therefore two  microscopic  balances  are sufficient  to  determine the
            concentration profiles (Figure 8), where y varies from y = 0 (at the wall surface) to y = δ (at
            the liquid surface).
















            Fig. 8. Mass balance on finite volume includes the boundary conditions at the solid wall and
            liquid/gas interface
            It is assumed that the mass balance for SO 3(G) absorbing by the liquid (equation 1) can also
            be applied  to  reagent  in the  liquid  phase where reaction occurs, then  equation 2 is  the
            steady state mass balance on the absorbing species A in liquid phase.





             www.intechopen.com
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14