Page 10 - Microsoft Word - Sulfo and Sulfa 1.doc
P. 10

The process equipment cost is an important factor to be considered in choice of a
                   sulfonation process.  You must look at the installed cost of the system, tankage and
                   required safety systems.  The equipment cost is almost exactly the inverse of the reagent
                   cost.  Here, the air/SO  process is highest in cost while the simple batch sulfamic process
                                        3
                   is lowest.  Other processes are intermediate.

                   The final factor to consider in the choice of sulfonation processes is the cost of waste
                   disposal.  The chlorosulfuric acid and oleum sulfonation processes produce large
                   by-product streams of either hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid.  These by-products must
                   be recovered and sold, or disposed of as a waste.  Waste disposal can have a significant
                   impact on the profitability of these processes, as the necessary equipment can be costly
                   and the disposal costs can be high.

                                                                                     [1]
                   Figure 10 shows the trends in sulfonation plants in the United States .  The air/SO
                                                                                                   3
                   process has rapidly overtaken the oleum process as the predominate choice.  This is the
                   result of several trends.  The first is the waste disposal cost for the spent sulfuric acid
                   from the oleum process.  The second is the desire of many processors to avoid storing a
                   hazardous material such as oleum.  The third is the move toward compact detergent
                   products which reduces or eliminates the sodium sulfate content of detergent products.
                   The oleum process adds a large quantity of sulfate to the products and for many
                   applications this is not acceptable.  Finally, the air/SO  process is capable of making a
                                                                       3
                   broad range of very high quality products.


                   Figure 10.    Estimated U.S. Sulfonation Plants


                                                 1980                1985              1990

                                           No. of              No. of              No. of
                           Plant Type     Plants   Capacity*   Plants   Capacity*   Plants  Capacity*


                           SO 3              44     630.0        62     855          41     1,016
                           Oleum             51     720.0        50     605          39       548
                           Chlorosulfonic
                              Acid            5      35.0         6       50          6        59
                           Sulfoxidation      1        0.45       2        1.35       1         0.45

                           Totals           101    1385.45      120    1,511.35      87     1,623.45


                           *Million kg/yr (Information supplied by E.A. Knaggs)





                   Page 9 of 36                                                   © 1997 The Chemithon Corporation
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15