Page 85 - Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary
P. 85

Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary


            0                    HeALtH LiteRACY, eHeALtH, AnD CoMMUniCAtion

            density  of  text,  or  for  readability  levels  of  charts  or  information.  This
            would  seem  to  be  important  given  the  differing  abilities  of  people  to
            read and comprehend. Or is this an issue that people are just beginning
            to realize is important?
               Solomon responded that this is an important issue. MiVIA has focused
            on technology, privacy, and security of applications. This third generation
            needs to start looking at health-literacy aspects.
               One participant, noting that several of the speakers touched on train-
            ing  and  helping  people  understand  how  to  use  the  technology,  asked,
            Are there any best practices or standards for how to do that effectively or
            well, or is it so early that one is just at the point of doing something and
            sharing information?
               Gauthier responded that it has been her experience that people do
            not  expect  or  want  to  have  to  go  through  a  2-hour  training  session  to
            use a website. People expect to be able to sit down and use any website
            that is out there. With the newer technologies—for example, the so-called
            Ajax Rich Internet Applications—there is an opportunity to build robust
            contextual help. Patients may be listing their care team on the form with
            no problem, but then they get to the advanced directions and are at a loss
            for what to do. It is at this point that they are ready for a training module
            embedded in the application that could walk them through the process.
            Embedding  more  contextual  training  in  the  applications  themselves  is
            probably the best approach to take.
               Seidman agreed, although he pointed out that there is a portion of the
            population that is not yet versed in computers and does not use them. The
            idea of using promotores or community health workers as educators is a
            good one which seems to work well. There are other resources that can
            be deployed as well, such as librarians and other ancillary health profes-
            sionals. In many cases, however, it is the community health workers who
            have been found to be most effective and the best use of resources. In one
            case, for example, a janitor’s union engaged unemployed janitors to help
            train union members in the use of computers. Union members’ reception
            of the training was very positive.
               Solomon remarked that, on average, it takes a physician anywhere
            from 4 to 12 hours to learn to use an electronic medical record. Outreach
            and training for the community using the promotores engages the members
            and is a good model. Such training is really health advocacy. During the
            session members learn about all kinds of things, including how to talk
            with the physician, how health care is important to the member, and the
            importance of the member being a partner in the health care experience.
               One audience member said that it is important that those designing
            PHRs want to listen—to hear from the patients about their needs. Starting
            with people’s needs and working with them is crucial. But how does one






                 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90