Page 83 - Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary
P. 83

Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary


                                HeALtH LiteRACY, eHeALtH, AnD CoMMUniCAtion

            it serves because those members have so many providers. A member may
            go to a public health clinic, an emergency room, and two or three clinics
            in a just a few months. If the patient’s health information is dispersed
            throughout  all  those  sites,  it  can  contribute  to  poor  outcomes  for  the
            member. MiVIA, as a single storage site, can facilitate better coordination
            and outcomes. This does not mean that the various facilities do not have
            their own charts, but all the information relevant to the member is stored
            in the MiVIA personal health record.
               The  same  participant  asked  what  the  repercussions  are  regarding
            reimbursement and revenue streams for using these electronic tools, espe-
            cially for the providers who are providing clinical care.
               Solomon replied that, for MiVIA, the members are mostly uninsured
            and use clinics that are reimbursed under special programs. It is critical,
            however, to start looking at how to promote reimbursement to providers
            so that they participate as partners with their patients in getting this infor-
            mation online. PHRs, especially with vulnerable populations, contribute
            to costs savings because results of tests are located in the record, which
            negates the need for running the same test or for scanning multiple times
            as the patient visits multiple providers.
               One participant said that hearing about the Shared Care Plan is awe
            inspiring. How applicable is it to other parts of the country? The Shared
            Care Plan is in a rural area with a defined set of providers, and the patient
            research was conducted in that community. What can be learned from that
            work to think about how to apply this in other places?
               Gauthier responded that the circumstances in Whatcom County did
            enable  the  project  to  move  farther  than,  perhaps,  other  locales  would.
            What was done in Whatcom County is available for download, but what
            is of foremost importance is that those constructing PHRs should conduct
            user research. One may or may not end up with the same kind of PHR
            that Whatcom County did. Certainly the example of MiVIA shows that
            things vary from city to city.
               Another  very  important  lesson  is  to  give  patients  the  respect  they
            deserve for what they are trying to accomplish in the health care system.
            Many people have the attitude that getting clinicians together in a room
            to brainstorm about what patients need is sufficient, but that is simply not
            true. Just because a clinician works with patients on a day-to-day basis
            does not mean that the clinician understands what patients are experienc-
            ing at the pharmacy or when they go home.
               Another useful thing would be to standardize the definition of a per-
            sonal health record and the components that make up that record. Solomon
            said  that  the  Markle  Foundation,  as  part  of  its  Connecting  for  Health
            work  (http://www.connectingforhealth.org/workinggroups/personal
            healthwg.html), will be releasing some recommendations, principles, and






                 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88