Page 121 - An Evidence Review of Active Surveillance in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
P. 121

Adherence to AS. No study or survey specifically addressed how the involvement of a
               consulting physician might affect adherence to AS.


               Clinical Factors
               Offer of AS. One survey of 1063 urologists and radiation oncologists reported that about 10 to
               20 percent would recommend WW for a patient with a PSA of around 5 ng/mL and a Gleason
               score of around 4 or 5 (the given scenario was a 65 years old man in good health, with negative
               DRE and no evidence of nonlocalized disease), but almost none would recommend WW for
               those with higher PSA or Gleason scores (Fowler 2000). 188  The responses of urologists and
               radiation oncologists did not differ significantly.

               Acceptance of AS

               Age. Twelve multivariable analyses provided results for age with respect to
               AS/WW.   66,77,159,161,162,166,171,174,175,177,179,180  All reported men who were older (generally aged 65
               to 75 years) had an increased probability of receiving AS/WW versus active treatments.

               Comorbidities. Five multivariable analyses reported that men with an increased number of
               comorbidities also had an increased probability of receiving AS/WW versus active
               treatments. 66,77,159,164-166  Two multivariable analyses did not find an association. 177,180

               Gleason score. Three multivariable analyses reported that men with a higher Gleason score also
                                                                                                    171
               had a decreased probability of receiving AS/WW versus any other treatment. 77,180  or RP.

               Histopathology. Two multivariable analyses provided results for histopathology with respect to
               AS/WW.   159,166  Both reported that men with well-differentiated, as compared to either moderately
               or poorly differentiated, prostate tumors had an increased probability of receiving AS/WW
               versus other treatments.

               Stage. Three multivariable analyses reported that men with higher stage disease (local versus in
                    199
               situ;  T2 versus T1 171,177 ) had a decreased probability of receiving AS/WW versus active
               treatments.

               PSA. Three multivariable analyses reported that men with increased PSA had a decreased
               probability of receiving AS/WW versus active treatment. 77,171,177  One multivariable analysis of
               men with high risk but nonmetastatic prostate cancer reported that higher PSA (>20 vs. ≤10
                                                                                               179
               ng/mL) was associated with increased probability of receiving AS/WW versus RP.

               Risk groups. Two multivariable analyses reported that men assessed as D’Amico low-risk 200
               (versus intermediate- or high-risk) had an increased probability of receiving AS/WW versus
               active treatments. 66,161


               medical oncologists were more likely than those seen by both urologists and radiation oncologists to receive
               AS/WW (all ages combined: 26.3 percent or 34.1 percent vs. 4.6 percent, respectively; see original paper for age-
                             198
               stratified results).  This study did not meet our multivariable analysis inclusion criterion.


                                                             67
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126