Page 124 - An Evidence Review of Active Surveillance in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
P. 124

the seriousness of the condition as well as treatment choice. 183  One survey of 654 men with early
               stage prostate cancer reported that men who chose RP over RT or WW perceived prostate cancer
               as a significantly more serious disease. 185  Another survey of 102 men with localized prostate
               cancer reported that fear of consequences was the most common reason for not selecting WW. 187

               Adherence to AS. No study or survey specifically addressed how risk perceptions might affect
               the adherence to AS.

               Family History
               Offer of AS. No study or survey specifically addressed how family history might affect the offer
               of AS.

               Acceptance of AS. No study or survey specifically addressed how family history might affect
               the acceptance of AS.

               Adherence to AS. Two multivariable analyses reported that family history was not a significant
               factor in predicting interruption of AS/WW. 175,176


               Social Support
               Offer of AS. No study or survey specifically addressed how social support might affect the offer
               of AS.

               Acceptance of AS. Four multivariable analyses reported that not being married or in a
               permanent relationship was associated with an increased probability of receiving WW versus
               active treatments. 77,160,166,180  One analysis found that marital status was not a factor in predicting
               receiving WW.  177
                   A report of interviews with 18 couples in which the men were recently diagnosed with early
               stage prostate cancer and had not yet decided on a treatment demonstrated the complexity of
               reaching a treatment decision. 194  The authors concluded that couples ruled out options based on
               both formal (provided by the physicians) and informal (provided by family and friends)
               information, and that they also “considered both their own individual histories and concerns and
               their shared life experiences.” Of the 18 couples referred by urologists, only one couple elected
               watchful waiting. The authors further stated that “’Doing nothing’ was ultimately rejected for the
               certainty [the couples] perceived to be associated with it: certain death, feared to be slow and
               painful.”

               Acceptance of AS. One multivariable analysis reported that marital status was not associated
                                              164
               with time to interruption of AS.
               Other Factors That Could Affect the Offer of, Acceptance of, or
               Adherence to AS

               Income or socioeconomic status. Three multivariable analyses examined income level with
               respect to AS/WW.  66,177,199  One reported that less than $30,000 annual income (versus at least
               $40,000) in men with prostate cancer was associated with an increased probability of receiving
                                               199
               AS/WW versus other treatments.  The remaining two reported that income was not a
               significant factor in predicting the choice of AS/WW versus other treatments. 66,177



                                                             70
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129