Page 185 - 16Neonatal Jaundice_compressed
P. 185

Neonatal jaundice





                         more reliable strategy for the detection of babies who require treatment with phototherapy may
                         be required if it is cost-effective.
                         The cost of the care of a person with kernicterus throughout their life runs to millions of pounds.
                         If resources were invested in a testing strategy that is effective in reducing the number of cases
                         of kernicterus annually by one case per year, it would be cost saving if the total annual cost of
                         the strategy  were less than  the discounted lifetime cost of caring for one individual with the
                         disease. Since kernicterus is a lifetime condition with poor quality of life, the value that the NHS
                         places on preventing a case of kernicterus is not only calculated as the cost saved by preventing
                         the downstream costs but  also the £20,000 per  quality-adjusted life year (QALY)  over the
                         lifetime of the condition.  Clearly, if the intervention were  more successful in preventing
                         kernicterus, then more NHS resources could be used to identify hyperbilirubinaemia and still be
                         cost-effective.
                         It seems plausible that a  more intensive  testing  strategy could be clinically effective if it
                         overcomes the limitations of visual examination alone, thereby leading to better detection and
                         treatment.  Currently, there are two  methods of testing:  a TSB and a transcutaneous
                         bilirubinometer (TCB), which is a non-invasive test on the surface of the skin. TCB is probably
                         not  accurate  above  a  threshold  level  of  250 micromol/litre  of  bilirubin  so  that  TSB  testing  is
                         required in babies whose TCB is above this threshold level. Hence a strategy involving more
                         bilirubin measurements could be based on TSB alone or TCB with TSB only required for those
                         babies whose TCB level was higher than the threshold value. Current evidence does not favour
                         one strategy over the other for the detection  of babies with bilirubin levels under
                         250 micromols/litre. That is, even though TSB is the gold standard test, both strategies, when
                         used correctly as part of an assessment and management process to test babies who are visibly
                         jaundiced, would be  equally effective at detecting hyperbilirubinaemia and preventing
                         kernicterus. Both methods are in  use in the  NHS.  The TSB can be analysed in hospital
                         laboratories without the need for additional equipment. The TCB requires the purchase of hand-
                         held devices, sufficient for one to be available for each community midwife  undertaking
                         postnatal visits on any particular day.
                         The economic evaluation was undertaken to determine the conditions under which increased
                         testing  would  be  cost-effective,  and  to  explore  which  testing  strategy  would  be  cost-effective
                         under different circumstances.


              C.4        Method

                         In this analysis  we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of  moving from current practice to a more
                         intensive test strategy in England and Wales subject to the limitations of the published evidence.

                         The following strategies are compared:
                         1. ‘Current practice’ – a visual examination followed by TSB in 10% of visually jaundiced
                           babies
                         2. TSB – a TSB on all babies with a positive visual examination
                         3. TCB followed by TSB if positive TCB – a TCB on all babies with a positive visual
                           examination, with a TSB on those babies with a positive TCB.

                         Visual examination has a high negative predictive value, which means that babies who do not
                         appear visually jaundiced are very unlikely to have clinically significant jaundice. However,
                         visual  examination  has  been  shown  to be unreliable  in  detecting  the  severity of
                         hyperbilirubinaemia. Therefore, visual  examination alone as a basis for detecting jaundice
                         requiring phototherapy has poor sensitivity, which may put jaundiced babies at a higher risk of
                         developing kernicterus.
                         Detection of hyperbilirubinaemia requiring treatment or further monitoring can be better
                         assessed using a TCB or a blood test to measure the TSB. The TCB is done with a hand-held
                         device (such as the Minolta JM-103 or the BiliChek) that is simple to use and is placed on the
                         baby’s skin. The TSB is the gold standard test but is more invasive and distressing to the baby
                         since it requires a blood sample. Both tests can be carried out by the midwife during the home
                         visit or in hospital if the baby has not been discharged.


              154
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190