Page 139 - 16Neonatal Jaundice_compressed
P. 139

Neonatal jaundice





                         Three studies 135-137   compared changes in serum bilirubin with each intervention.  The mean
                         decrease in serum bilirubin was statistically significantly greater in the multiple phototherapy
                         group  (MD = 27.75 micromol/litre,  95% CI  14.50  to  41.00 micromol/litre)  (Figure 7.4).
                         Heterogeneity was significant (I² = 74%).

                                         Conventional  Multiple    Mean Difference      Mean Difference
                          Study or Subgroup  Mean  SD Total  Mean  SD Total Weight  IV, Fixed, 95% CI  IV, Fixed, 95% CI
                          1.1.2 Multiple phototherapy
                          F - Al-Alaiyan 1996  -14  28  15  -19  35  15  34.1%  5.00 [-17.68, 27.68]
                          F - Boonyarittipong 2008  -111  39  30  -144  36  30  48.7% 33.00 [14.01, 51.99]
                          F - Nuntnarumit 2002  -98  46  27  -156  67  24  17.2% 58.00 [26.07, 89.93]
                          Subtotal (95% CI)      72         69 100.0% 27.75 [14.50, 41.00]
                          Heterogeneity: Chi² = 7.61, df = 2 (P = 0.02); I² = 74%
                          Test for overall effect: Z = 4.11 (P < 0.0001)
                                                                              -100  -50     0     50    100
                                                                                Favours Conventional  Favours Multiple
                          Test for subgroup differences: Not applicable
                         Figure 7. 4   Mean decrease in serum bilirubin when conventional phototherapy is compared with
                         multiple phoptotherapy in term babies


                         See  below  for  the  overall  evidence  summary  and  GDG  translation  from  evidence  for
                         phototherapy in term/normal-birthweight babies.

                         Conventional phototherapy versus fibreoptic phototherapy

                         Description of included studies
                         Six studies 135;138-142  with 426 participants were included in this comparison. Two of the studies
                         were from the USA 140;141  and there was one apiece from Italy, 142  Saudi Arabia, 135  Singapore 138
                         and Turkey. 139  The included studies ranged from EL 1− to EL 1+. Three studies specified the
                         method of randomisation used as the lottery method, 138  computer-generated 141  or sequential 139
                         and the remaining three studies did not report the method used. Two  studies 135;142   reported
                         using sealed envelopes as allocation concealment while in one study 139   the nurses who
                         allocated the babies to the groups were blind to the serum bilirubin levels.

                         Where reported, the mean gestational age ranged from 37.9 ± 2.1 weeks to 39.6 ± 1.6 weeks,
                         mean birthweight ranged from 2921 ± 696 g to 3380 ± 359 g, mean age at entry to study ranged
                         from 37.9 ± 24.1 hours to 105.4 ± 42.8 hours (not reported in two studies) and mean baseline
                         serum  bilirubin  levels  ranged  from  185 ± 56 micromol/litre  to  308 ± 47 micromol/litre.  In  the
                         studies that reported gender, 190 participants (55.4%) were male.
                         Review findings
                         No exchange transfusions were needed with either intervention. Two studies 138;139  reported on
                         treatment failures, defined in one study 139  as having two successive rises in serum bilirubin after
                         initiation  of phototherapy,  but not defined in the second. 138   Babies  who received fibreoptic
                         phototherapy were more likely to be considered as treatment failures (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to
                         0.92) (Figure 7.5). There was no heterogeneity (I² = 0%).


                                        Conventional  Fibreoptic    Risk Ratio           Risk Ratio
                          Study or Subgroup  Events  Total Events Total Weight  M-H, Fixed, 95% CI  M-H, Fixed, 95% CI
                          1.1.3 Fiberoptic
                          F - Sarici 2001   0   50    4   50  46.6%  0.11 [0.01, 2.01]
                          F - Tan 1997      0   44    7   85  53.4%  0.13 [0.01, 2.18]
                          Subtotal (95% CI)     94       135 100.0%  0.12 [0.02, 0.92]
                          Total events      0        11
                          Heterogeneity: Chi² = 0.00, df = 1 (P = 0.95); I² = 0%
                          Test for overall effect: Z = 2.05 (P = 0.04)

                                                                              0.01  0.1     1     10    100
                                                                               Favours Conventional  Favours Fibreoptic
                         Figure 7.5  Number  of  treatment failures  when  conventional  phototherapy is  compared with
                         fibreoptic phototherapy in term babies





              108
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144