Page 158 - 15Diarrhoeaandvomiting
P. 158

Other therapies




               8.5.7       Escherichia coli Nissle 1917

                           Evidence overview
                           One multicentre RCT 199  was identified. The study was carried out in 11 paediatric outpatient
                           centres across Ukraine, Germany and Russia. In total, 113 children aged between 2 and 47 months
                           with non-bloody acute diarrhoea were randomised into two treatment arms (58 patients in the
                           probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 group and 55 in the placebo group) and followed up until treatment
                           response or to a maximum of 10 days. The participants were allocated into the two groups based
                           on random numbers. Allocation was such that participants and outcome assessors were unaware
                           of the treatment given. The authors used an intention-to-treat analysis. The outcomes considered
                           were  duration  of  diarrhoea,  proportion  of  patients  without  diarrhoea  within  the  10th  day  of
                           follow-up and adverse events. [EL = 1+]
                           The baseline comparability between the two groups at the start of the study was adequate, and
                           12.3%  of  participants  were  lost  during  follow-up. The  treatment  response  was  defined  as  a
                           reduction in stool frequency to three or fewer watery or loose stools in 24 hours over a period
                           of at least two consecutive days. When comparing the median duration of diarrhoea between
                           the two groups, the authors reported that E. coli Nissle 1917 statistically significantly shortened
                           the duration of diarrhoea by 2.3 days (median duration of diarrhoea in the intervention group
                           = 2.5 days, median duration of diarrhoea in the control group = 4.8 days). Diarrhoea stopped
                           within 10 days for 52/55 children in the intervention group and for 39/58 children in the control
                           group. This difference was statistically significant (RR 1.41; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.70). Two children
                           in the intervention group (n = 55) suffered from rhinitis and abdominal pain while two children
                           in the control group (n = 58) had acute otitis media.

                           Evidence summary

                           There was evidence form one multicentre RCT conducted in Russia, Ukraine and Germany for
                           the effectiveness of E. coli Nissle 1917 in the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children. The study
                           reported that those children receiving E. coli Nissle 1917 probiotic responded to treatment in
                           a  statistically  significantly  shorter  time  than  those  receiving  placebo.  Diarrhoea  had  stopped
                           by  day  10  in  statistically  significantly  more  children  receiving  E.  coli  Nissle  1917  probiotic
                           compared with the placebo.

                           GDG translation from evidence to recommendation

                           There  were  many  studies  examining  the  efficacy  of  probiotic  therapy  in  children  with
                           gastroenteritis. There was evidence from a high-quality systematic review suggesting that probiotic
                           treatment had a beneficial effect – shortening the duration of diarrhoea and reducing the stool
                           frequency. However, the available studies varied in quality, in the specific probiotics studied, in
                           the treatment regimens used and in the outcomes examined. Therefore, despite some evidence
                           of possible clinical benefit, the GDG did not consider it appropriate to recommend the use of a
                           probiotic at this time. This was, however, considered to be an important field for further research.
                           Licensed preparations of probiotics are not currently available in the NHS.


                            Research recommendation
                            Are probiotics effective and safe compared with a placebo in the treatment of children with
                            gastroenteritis  in  the  UK? Which  specific  probiotic  is  most  effective  and  in  what  specific
                            treatment regimen?
                            Why this is important
                            The available studies of probiotic therapy frequently report benefits, particularly in terms of
                            reduced duration of diarrhoea or stool frequency. However, most of the published studies
                            have methodological limitations. Moreover, there is great variation in the specific probiotics
                            evaluated  and  in  the  treatment  regimens  used.  Many  of  these  studies  were  conducted
                            in  developing  countries  where  the  response  to  probiotic  therapy  may  differ.  Good-quality
                            randomised controlled trials should be conducted in the UK to evaluate the effectiveness and
                            safety of specific probiotics, using clearly defined treatment regimens and outcome measures.




                                                                                                         133
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163