Page 161 - 80 guidelines for the treatment of malaria_opt
P. 161

ANNEX 7. Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria


                              No serious indirectness: trials were conducted in Asia (Cambodia and Thailand) in areas of low and unstable transmission; children aged <1 year and pregnant or lactating women were excluded.







                          No serious limitations: allocation concealment was judged to be at “low risk of bias” in all trials reporting this outcome; laboratory staff were blinded in two of the trials.


                                      Serious indirectness: only one trial, conducted in Peru in a low transmission setting; children aged <5 years and pregnant and lactating women were excluded.
                                                    Serious imprecision: the 95% CI of the pooled estimate includes appreciable benefit with DHA+PPQ over AS+MQ and no difference between the drugs.
           In these trials, both drugs have total failure rates (PCR adjusted) at day 63 of less than 10% in line with WHO recommendations.
                                No serious imprecision: the 95% CI of the pooled estimate includes appreciable benefit with DHA+PPQ over AS+MQ and non-appreciable benefit.


                                        Very serious imprecision: the 95% CI of the pooled estimate is wide including appreciable benefit or harm with each drug over the other.
                                                Very serious imprecision: the 95% CI of the pooled estimate includes appreciable benefit or harm with both drugs over the other.

              DHA+PPQ is at least as effective at treating P. falciparum as AS+MQ in Asia (high quality evidence).
                      Data on treatment failure at days 42 and 28 were also available and no differences between the two drugs were shown.
                                    No serious limitations: allocation concealment was assessed as “low risk of bias”; no blinding was described in this trial.
                  No difference has been shown in the incidence of serious adverse events (low quality evidence).
                                              No serious limitations: allocation concealment was judged to be at “low risk of bias” in seven out of eight trials.
                                            No serious indirectness: trials conducted in Asia and South America in low and unstable transmission settings.
                                          No serious imprecision: both limits of the 95% CI suggest appreciable benefit with AS+MQ over DHA+PPQ.
                DHA+PPQ is not as effective on gametocytes as AS+MQ (high quality evidence).

                                                  Serious limitations: all trials were open label and judged to at “high risk of bias” for blinding.






                                                                                       A7










                        Cambodia (11) and Thailand (12, 13).  No serious inconsistency: heterogeneity was low.





           panel comment:     panel conclusion:             Peru (14).




                                         11.
                                       10.
                                                   16.
                                                 15.
                                               14.
                                           12.
                                             13.
                         3.
                           4.
                     1.
                       2.
                             5.
                                   8.
                                     9.
                               6.
                                 7.


                                                                                      147
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166