Page 285 - AIDSBK23C
P. 285

Page 285


               and the need for psychological and social support services.[251]  A significant problem is the
               failure of persons tested to return for results.  The use of rapid HIV testing for screening (results
               in less than an hour) leads to a greater number of new HIV infections detected and in fewer
               patients leaving before test results are obtained.[1119]
                       Pregnant women represent an important group for whom HIV testing can provide
               considerable benefit.  This is because of the significant reduction in perinatal HIV transmission
               that can be accomplished by giving mothers-to-be antiretroviral therapy.[185]
                       Mandatory testing remains controversial.  The stigma associated with a diagnosis of HIV
               infection continues to prevent infected persons from being treated similar to patients with most
               other illnesses.  This makes HIV testing less than routine.  In the U.S., mandatory testing has
               been applied to personnel in the armed forces, Foreign Service personnel, immigrants, and
               certain sex offenders.  Other jurisdictions, including some of the individual states in the U.S.,
               have mandated testing for additional populations, including prisoners and newborns.  Many
               states provide for compulsory testing of patients to determine their HIV status when an injury to
               a health care worker may involve possible HIV transmission.[1110]
                       In the U.S., the results of HIV testing for medical purposes are generally held to be
               confidential.  Most states have laws protecting confidentiality of HIV-related information.
               However, all states require reporting of all patients diagnosed with AIDS to governmental health
               departments, though little more than half of the states require similar reporting for HIV infection.
               A “duty to warn” other persons, including spouses and sex partners, regarding a patient’s HIV
               positivity by health care providers is specifically permitted by law in some states, though the
               courts have ruled that the health care provider has a duty to warn persons at risk for
               infection.[1110]
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290