Page 228 - Drug Class Review
P. 228

placebo (P < 0.001); odds of improvement in CIBIC-plus scores were twice as great with DON 5 or 10 mg/d
                                                                                            Blindly accepted trials if they were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group studies and
             Drug Effectiveness Review Project
                                                                  compared with 62% of placebo treated patients; discontinuations due to adverse events were higher in DON
                                                                                                                                                      Page 144 of 205
                                    outcome measures included ADAS-Cog treatment difference; ADAS-Cog response (improvement of 4 or 7
                                10 trials comparing either 5 or 10 mg/d over 12 to 24 weeks in patients with mild to moderate AD; primary
                                                                     10 mg/d (13.9%) than in DON 5 mg/d (6.3%) or placebo (5.8%) group; significantly greater incidence of
                                              ADAS-Cog score statistically significantly better for 5 or 10 mg/d DON at all time points compared with
                                                                        nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, headache and insomnia in DON 10 mg/d than DON 5 mg/d or placebo group
                                                                               No systematic search was reported; the trials were provided by the DON clinical Development Program
                                                              Adverse events occurred in 65% and 83% of patients treated with 5 or 10 mg/d DON respectively,
























                                                    as with placebo and statistically significant (P < 0.001)










                                       points); CIBIC-plus; MMSE; CDR-SB





                                                                                                   included in the meta-analysis  if patients satisfied inclusion criteria; no other methods were discussed as to how trials were evaluated to be



















                                                                                                         Fair











             Final Report Update 1    Authors:  Whitehead et al.   Year: 2004   CHARACTERISTICS OF   INTERVENTIONS:         MAIN RESULTS:      ADVERSE EVENTS:      COMPREHENSIVE  LITERATURE SEARCH   STRATEGY:     STANDARD METHOD OF  APPRAISAL OF STUDIES:         QUALITY RATING:            Alzheimer's Drugs
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233