Page 80 - Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary
P. 80

Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary


            PAneL

            patient hears in the physician’s office is completely forgotten by the time
            he or she gets home (Eiser, 1982) When the patient returns home, he or she
            will generally have numerous questions still unanswered. In response, the
            patient goes to the Internet. The patient may also go to other places as
            well in the search for information.
               It is not difficult to find information on the Internet. The difficulty is
            finding information relative to a specific need. Even if people find what
            they  need,  they  may  not  understand  what  they  find.  If  they  find  and
            understand the information, the next challenge is to remember it. If they
            find, understand, and remember the information, they must then figure
            out how to contextualize it, that is, they must determine what the infor-
            mation means for their particular care and needs.
               This is the task of information therapy; to figure out how to bring two
            worlds together in order to make sure that the information people need
            is there for them at the right time. Information therapy recognizes that
            there is a difference between data and information. If one looks at a PHR,
            for example, it may contain data that are hard to read and interpret. But
            going from data to information therapy requires making sense of those
            data and putting them into some context that leads to information, then
            to knowledge, and ultimately, to behavior.
               Appropriate use of HIT can help individuals make informed health
            decisions. The Center for Information Therapy took part in a project that
            observed how clinicians and patients use HIT to advance patient educa-
                                                8
            tion and to make better use of HIT tools.  Time was spent in a wide vari-
            ety of settings—small practices with one or two physicians, for example,
            multi-specialty groups, and in integrated delivery systems. About half of
            the time was spent in federally qualified community health centers.
               Health literacy issues cut across various populations. One important
            observation  of  the  project  was  that  some  of  the  biggest  health  literacy
            challenges occur with people who have significantly impaired cognitive
            function, such as people with mental illness.
               If  one  is  to  understand  what  actually  happens  with  patients,  one
            must spend time on site. For that reason, project staff spent a great deal
            of time observing the interactions of clinicians and patients. But before
            they observed these clinician/patient interactions, the project staff spoke
            with administrators of the facilities. One finding was that the way in
            which  administrators  viewed  things  was  often  contradicted  by  what


             8    Safety  net  providers  observed  included  the  Institute  for  Family  Health  (New  York);
            East Boston Neighborhood Health Center; Cambridge Health Alliance (Massachusetts); La
            Clinica de La Raza (California); District of Columbia Primary Care Association; Lifelong
            Medical Care (California); Queens Health Network (New York); UNITE HERE! (New York);
            Urban Health Plan (New York); Baltimore Medical System; Redwood Community Health
            Coalition; and MiVia/La Luz Community Center (California).





                 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85