Page 297 - 20dynamics of cancer
P. 297

282                                                CHAPTER 13

                                This optimal design, with long transit lineages and no stem lineage,
                              assumes that all k cells survive to the end of the required period, with
                              no sloughing of cells. However, the requirement for continual cell death
                              at epithelial surfaces imposes an additional requirement. But for now,
                              I am just asking about the best design in the absence of the constraint
                              imposed by renewal, to understand how much of tissue architecture may
                              be explained by natural selection among alternative designs versus how
                              much may be explained by the unavoidable constraints of renewal.
                                This first analysis suggests that natural selection favors long transit
                              lineages and no stem lineage. If so, then the stem-transit design may
                              be the consequence solely of continual cell death at the tissue surface,
                              which imposes a stem-transit separation by shortening the cell lineages
                              that lead to the sloughing of surface cells. But we should consider two
                              additional factors.
                                First, the stem lineage may have a lower mutation rate than the tran-
                              sit lineage. Cairns (1975) proposed that immortal stranding and high
                              sensitivity to DNA damage lower the stem-line mutation rate (See Sec-
                              tion 12.4). If the stem lineage does have a lower mutation rate than the
                              transit lineage, then natural selection would favor adding more cell di-
                              visions to the lower-risk stem line. In terms of design, this benefit of
                              stem divisions would lengthen the stem lineage, that is, increase n 1 in
                              Figure 13.5, and would shorten the higher-risk transit lineages, that is,
                              decrease n 2 .
                                Second, the transit lineage may be partially protected, because a tran-
                              sit cell that gets the required n carcinogenic changes may still slough
                              off. This benefit would favor lengthening the transit lineages, because
                              natural selection always tends to allocate additional divisions to those
                              lineages with the lowest relative risk. This particular benefit for transit
                              lineages works against the maintenance of a distinct, long-lived stem
                              line.
                                In summary, two factors appear to favor a stem-transit design. A
                              renewing tissue necessarily has continual cell death that prunes cell lin-
                              eages and creates a dichotomy between short and long cell lineages.
                              That constraint of tissue renewal may be sufficient to explain the stem-
                              transit design, even though, with regard to cancer risk, natural selection
                              often favors a more even distribution of cell lineage length. Alterna-
                              tively, if the stem line accrues mutations at a lower rate than the transit
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302