Page 128 - Screening for Cervical Cancer: Systematic Evidence Review

Appendix C. Evidence Tables

Evidence Table 2. New Methods for Preparing or Evaluating Cervical Cytology (cont'd)

Source: Study Design &
Author, Year Characteristics Interventions Location & Time Period
Papnet
Mitchell and Evaluation of Papnet Papnet rescreening Australia
99
Medley, 1998 rescreening
1990-1992

O’Leary et al., Prospective evaluation of Papnet rescreening Washington, DC
1998 100 Papnet rescreening
1994-1995

Government pathology
organization

Duggan, Diagnostic test evaluation Rescreen of conventional Calgary, Alberta
2000 60 of Papnet system vs. manual screening Pap
conventional manually read results using Papnet Starting date for slide selection:
Paps in primary screening December 1995

Reference standard:
consensus by peer review

C-34