Page 36 - HIV/AIDS Guidelines
P. 36

Coreceptor Tropism Assays (Last updated January 10, 2011; last reviewed January 10, 2011)



                                                   Panel’s Recommendations
             • Coreceptor tropism assay should be performed whenever the use of a CCR5 inhibitor is being considered (AI).
             • Coreceptor tropism testing might also be considered for patients who exhibit virologic failure on a CCR5 inhibitor (CIII).

             Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Optional

             Rating of Evidence: I = data from randomized controlled trials; II = data from well-designed nonrandomized trials or observational
             cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes; III = expert opinion


            HIV enters cells by a complex process that involves sequential attachment to the CD4 receptor followed by
            binding to either the CCR5 or CXCR4 molecules and fusion of the viral and cellular membranes. CCR5
                                                                                                     1
            inhibitors (i.e., maraviroc [MVC]), prevent HIV entry into target cells by binding to the CCR5 receptor. 2
            Phenotypic and, to a lesser degree, genotypic assays have been developed that can determine the coreceptor
            tropism (i.e., CCR5, CXCR4, or both) of the patient’s dominant virus population. One assay (Trofile,
            Monogram Biosciences, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) was used to screen patients who were participating
            in studies that formed the basis of approval for MVC, the only CCR5 inhibitor currently available. Other
            assays are under development and are currently used primarily for research purposes or in clinical situations
            in which the Trofile assay is not readily available.

            Background
            The vast majority of patients harbor a CCR5-utilizing virus (R5 virus) during acute/recent infection, which
            suggests that the R5 variant is preferentially transmitted compared with the CXCR4 (X4) variant. Viruses in
            many untreated patients eventually exhibit a shift in coreceptor tropism from CCR5 to either CXCR4 or both
            CCR5 and CXCR4 (i.e., dual- or mixed-tropic; D/M-tropic). This shift is temporally associated with a more
            rapid decline in CD4 T-cell counts, 3-4 although whether this shift is a cause or a consequence of progressive
                                                   1
            immunodeficiency remains undetermined. Antiretroviral (ARV)-treated patients who have extensive drug
            resistance are more likely to harbor detectable X4- or D/M-tropic variants than untreated patients who have
                                        5
            comparable CD4 T-cell counts. The prevalence of X4- or D/M-tropic variants increases to more than 50% in
            treated patients who have CD4 counts <100 cells/mm .
                                                             3 5-6
            Phenotypic Assays

            There are now at least two high-throughput phenotypic assays that can quantify the coreceptor characteristics
            of plasma-derived virus. Both involve the generation of laboratory viruses that express patient-derived
            envelope proteins (i.e., gp120 and gp41). These pseudoviruses are either replication competent (Phenoscript
            assay, VIRalliance, Paris, France) or replication defective (Trofile assay, Monogram Biosciences, Inc.). 7-8
            These pseudoviruses then are used to infect target cell lines that express either CCR5 or CXCR4. In the
            Trofile assay, the coreceptor tropism of the patient-derived virus is confirmed by testing the susceptibility of
            the virus to specific CCR5 or CXCR4 inhibitors in vitro. The Trofile assay takes about 2 weeks to perform
            and requires a plasma HIV RNA level ≥1,000 copies/mL.
            The performance characteristics of these assays have evolved. Most, if not all, patients enrolled in
            premarketing clinical trials of MVC and other CCR5 inhibitors were screened with an earlier, less sensitive
                                     7
            version of the Trofile assay. This earlier assay failed to routinely detect low levels of CXCR4-utilizing
            variants. As a consequence, some patients enrolled in these clinical trials harbored low, undetectable levels of
            CXCR4-utilizing viruses at baseline and exhibited rapid virologic failure after initiation of a CCR5
            inhibitor. This assay has since been revised and is now able to detect lower levels of CXCR4-utlizing
                    9

            Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents        C-18

                            Downloaded from http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines on 12/8/2012 EST.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41