Page 31 - HIV/AIDS Guidelines
P. 31

Table 4. Recommendations for Using Drug-Resistance Assays
            Page 2 of 2


                       Clinical Setting/Recommendation                             Rationale
             Drug-resistance assay recommended

             Addition of phenotypic assay to genotypic assay is generally  Phenotypic testing can provide useful additional information for
             preferred for those with known or suspected complex drug-  those with complex drug-resistance mutation patterns,
             resistance patterns, particularly to PIs (BIII).  particularly to PIs.

             In patients with suboptimal suppression of viral load: Drug-  Testing can help determine the role of resistance and thus assist
             resistance testing is recommended for persons with suboptimal  the clinician in identifying the number of active drugs available
             suppression of viral load after initiation of ART (AII).  for a new regimen.
             In HIV-infected pregnant women: Genotypic resistance testing is The goal of ART in HIV-infected pregnant women is to achieve
             recommended for all pregnant women prior to initiation of ART  maximal viral suppression for treatment of maternal HIV
             (AIII) and for those entering pregnancy with detectable HIV RNA  infection and for prevention of perinatal transmission of HIV.
             levels while on therapy (AI).                     Genotypic resistance testing will assist the clinician in selecting
                                                               the optimal regimen for the patient.
             Drug-resistance assay not usually recommended

             After therapy discontinued: Drug-resistance testing is not  Drug-resistance mutations might become minor species in the
             usually recommended after discontinuation (>4 weeks) of ARV  absence of selective drug pressure, and available assays might
             drugs (BIII).                                     not detect minor drug-resistant species. If testing is performed
                                                               in this setting, the detection of drug resistance may be of value;
                                                               however, the absence of resistance does not rule out the
                                                               presence of minor drug-resistant species.

             In patients with low HIV RNA levels: Drug-resistance testing is  Resistance assays cannot be consistently performed given low
             not usually recommended in persons with a plasma viral load  HIV RNA levels.
             <500 copies/mL (AIII).

            References

            1.  Hirsch MS, Gunthard HF, Schapiro JM, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adult HIV-1 infection: 2008
               recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA panel. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(2):266-285.
            2.  Flandre P, Costagliola D. On the comparison of artificial network and interpretation systems based on genotype
               resistance mutations in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. 2006;20(16):2118-2120.
            3.  Vercauteren J, Vandamme AM. Algorithms for the interpretation of HIV-1 genotypic drug resistance information.
               Antiviral Res. 2006;71(2-3):335-342.
            4.  Gianotti N, Mondino V, Rossi MC, et al. Comparison of a rule-based algorithm with a phenotype-based algorithm for the
               interpretation of HIV genotypes in guiding salvage regimens in HIV-infected patients by a randomized clinical trial: the
               mutations and salvage study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(10):1470-1480.

            5.  Torti C, Quiros-Roldan E, Regazzi M, et al. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate antiretroviral salvage therapy
               guided by rules-based or phenotype-driven HIV-1 genotypic drug-resistance interpretation with or without concentration-
               controlled intervention: the Resistance and Dosage Adapted Regimens (RADAR) study. Clin Infect Dis.
               2005;40(12):1828-1836.
            6.  Tural C, Ruiz L, Holtzer C, et al. Clinical utility of HIV-1 genotyping and expert advice: the Havana trial. AIDS.
               2002;16(2):209-218.
            7.  Lanier ER, Ait-Khaled M, Scott J, et al. Antiviral efficacy of abacavir in antiretroviral therapy-experienced adults harbouring
               HIV-1 with specific patterns of resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Antivir Ther. 2004;9(1):37-45.
            8.  Miller MD, Margot N, Lu B, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic predictors of the magnitude of response to tenofovir
               disoproxil fumarate treatment in antiretroviral-experienced patients. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(5):837-846.
            Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents        C-13

                            Downloaded from http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines on 12/8/2012 EST.
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36