Page 17 - Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 2005)
P. 17

C O O R D I N A T I O N  C O M  P O U N D S                         IR-9.3





                          The following sections outline  t he method used to arrive at the priority numbers for a
                       given set of donor atoms, and the ways that the basic rules have to be modified in order to
                       describe  a dequately systems that include polydentate ligands.  T hese modifications, which
                       are collectively referred to as the priming convention, make  u se of primes  o n  t he priority
                       numbers to indicate which donor atoms are grouped together w ithin a p articular polydentate
                       ligand.

           IR-9.3.5.2  Priority numbers
                       The procedure for assigning priorities in mononuclear coordination systems i s b ased on the
                       standard  s equence rules developed for chiral carbon compounds by Cahn, Ingold and
                       Prelog. 13  (See also Section P-91 of Ref. 1.) These CIP rules can be used quite generally for
                       assigning priorities to groups attached to a  c entral atom.
                          The essence of these rules, when  a pplied to coordination compounds, i s t hat the ligands
                       attached to the central atom are compared to one another, beginning with the donor atom and
                       then moving outwards in the structure. The comparison is made on the basis of atomic
                       number and then, i f  r equired (e.g. when isotopes  a re being specified), a tomic mass. Other
                       properties may be used for subsequent comparisons, but the need for them is sufficiently rare
                       that they need not be detailed here.
                          Once the ligands have been compared, the priority numbers are assigned as follows:

                       (i)  identical ligands are assigned the same priority,
                       (ii) the ligand(s) with highest priority is (are) assigned the priority number 1; those w ith the
                           next highest priority, 2; and so on.

                       Examples:
                           1.
                                                            5
                                                           O
                                                       1   C    2
                                                      Br       Cl
                                                       3        3
                                                     Ph P      PPh 3
                                                       3
                                                           NMe 3
                                                            4

                                         Priority sequence: Br4Cl4PPh 3 , P Ph 3 4NMe 3 4CO
                                           Priority numbers sequence: 14243, 34445

                           2.
                                                   3      1
                                                  H 3 N  OH
                                                   3  Pt  2
                                                                   CH 3
                                                  H 3 N  N      N
                                                                   H

                                                                  H
                       In Example 2, the heterocyclic ligand is given priority 2  s ince i t h as a  l ower atomic number
                       donor atom than OH, and the substitution of the nitrogen  d onor ranks it above the ammine
                       ligands.


                       194
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22