Page 22 - 65 thorax41-48_opt
P. 22

                                 Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Diaphragmatic Eventration   297
          Table 45.1: Evidence-based research.
            Title      Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infants with
                       congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review of the
                       evidence
            Authors    Morini F, Goldman A, Pierro A
            Institution  Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust,
                       London, UK
            Reference   Eur J Pediatr Surg
            Problem    The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence supporting
                       the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in
                       infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).
            Intervention  A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
                       comparing ECMO and conventional mechanical ventilation
                       (CMV)
            Comparison/  Meta-analysis
            control
            (quality of
            evidence)
            Outcome/   The early mortality was significantly lower with ECMO
            effect     compared to CMV (RR 0.73 [95 % CI 0.55-0.99]; p < 0.04);
                       however, late mortality was similar in the two groups (RR 0.83
                       [0.66-1.05]; p = 0.12).
            Historical   Nonrandomised studies suggest a reduction in mortality with
            significance/  ECMO. However, differences in the indications for ECMO and
            comments   improvements in other treatment modalities may contribute to
                       this reduction. The meta-analysis of RCTs indicates a reduction
                       in early mortality with ECMO but no long-term benefit.




                                                    Key Summary Points
             1.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is associated with a relatively   5.  Surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia is simple in most
                high mortality related to the associated pulmonary and   cases, but can be technically demanding in those with a large
                cardiovascular abnormalities present, and carries some long-  defect, requiring knowledge of methods available for secondary
                term morbidity in most cases. However, self-selected patients   closure. Surgery for recurrence can also be demanding, calling
                who present late have little long-term morbidity.  for advanced flap procedures.
             2.  Ventilatory and support mechanisms for patients with   6.  Other surgical procedures for gastro-oesophageal reflux and
                congenital diaphragmatic hernia have evolved significantly, but   feeding difficulties or other complications may be required.
                with minimal impact on survival in the severe cases.
                                                                 7.  Unlike congenital diaphragmatic hernia, eventration of the
             3.  At present, advanced support for congenital diaphragmatic   diaphragm is not usually associated with severe morbidity and
                hernia using ECMO is costly and does not seem to reduce the   mortality in most cases. Surgical correction of symptomatic
                long-term mortality; it may contribute to more morbidity.  cases is most often rewarded with prompt recovery with little
                                                                   long-term outcome.
             4.  The most important factors influencing outcome and long-term
                morbidity seem to be associated chromosomal and cardiac
                anomalies, the severity of the pulmonary hypertension, and the
                size of the defect.




                                                         References

             1.   Ba’ath ME, Jesudason EC, Losty PD. How useful is the lung-  6.   Numanoglu A, Morrison C, Rode H. Prediction of outcome in congenital
                 to-head ratio in predicting outcome in the fetus with congenital   diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int 1998; 13(8):564–568.
                 diaphragmatic hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.   7.   Moyer V, Moya F, Tibboel R, et al. Late versus early surgical
                 Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30(6):897–906.
                                                                     correction for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in newborn infants.
             2.   Harrison MR, Keller RL, Hawgood SB, et al. A randomized trial   Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (3):CD001695.
                 of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital
                 diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med 2003; 349(20):1916–1924.  8.   Grant H, Rode H, Cywes S. Potential danger of “trial of life”
                                                                     approach to congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1994;
             3.   Kitano Y. Prenatal intervention for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.   29(3):399.
                 Semin Pediatr Surg 2007; 16(2):101–108.
                                                                 9.   Lally KP, Engle W. Postdischarge follow-up of infants with
             4.   Mohseni-Bod H, Bohn D. Pulmonary hypertension in congenital   congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics 2008; 121(3):627–
                 diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg 2007; 16(2):126–133.  632.
             5.   Logan JW, Rice HE, Goldberg RN, Cotten CM. Congenital   10.  St Peter SD, Valusek PA, Tsao K, et al. Abdominal complications
                 diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-  related to type of repair for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J
                 evidence practice strategies. J Perinatol 2007; 27(9):535–549.  Surg Res 2007; 140(2):234–236.
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27