Page 38 - 59peadiatric-surgery-speciality8-14_opt
P. 38

Ethics of Paediatric Surgery in Africa  77
                    Western-Style Medical Ethics                 diagnosis,  prognosis,  treatment  options,  etc. A  patient’s  role,  on  the
          Let us first look at the Western style of medical ethics and at the five   other hand, is to inform his or her physician about values and prefer-
                                                                                      10
          important  constitutive  points  and  discuss  how  we  could  apply  these   ences concerning treatment”.  The assumption here seems to be that
          principles to an African context:                      all  value-judgements  should  be  the  patient’s  responsibility.  Such  an
                                                                 assumption, however, is illusionary because value-free information is
          1. growth of the middle class with its new value system of individual-  10
          ism, utilitarianism, and a culture of consumerism;     impossible to attain.
                                                                   More important are five consequences of this informative model.
          2. disenchantment of the world, leading to a decline of a reliance on   (1) It impoverishes the patient-physician relationship by discouraging
          myths, religions, and ideologies, leading to an increased rational and   doctors  from  empathising  with  their  patients  because  such  empathy
          practical approach to life;
                                                                 is considered undesirable and might negatively influence the doctor’s
          3. increased influence of feminism, giving rights to women;   professional  attitude.  (2)  It  stops  any  discussion  between  the  patient
          4. fragmentation of society into different spheres, such as human   and  doctor  from  the  beginning,  preventing  doctors  from  questioning
          rights, morality, religion, politics, jurisdiction, family, school, etc. as   perceived  strange  and  irrational  patient  treatment  demands  and
          well as the super-specialisation within medicine; and   preferences.  (3)  It  prohibits  physicians  from  sharing  their  acquired
                                                                 personal experiences and moral beliefs. (4) It completely misinterprets
          5. new belief or ideology of a technoscientific progress into utopia.
                                                                 patients’ preferences as ready-made and given; it does not acknowledge
            Such  faith  in  a  utopia  achievable  by  technoscientific  progress
                                                                 or  allow  patient  preferences  to  develop  or  to  be  adjusted  during  the
          boosted the scientific enterprise enormously. Such scientific discoveries
                                                                 course  of  illness  and  therapy.  (5)  It  deals  with  the  patient-doctor
          were not only embraced with enthusiasm, but created an equal amount
                                                                 relationship and their respective preferences and attitudes as if there
          of  controversy.  Medical  progress  (e.g.,  haemodialysis  becoming
                                                                 were  no  overall,  encompassing  societal  good  to  be  considered;  it
          possible with the development of the arteriovenous shunt, or techniques
                                                                 completely ignores that both patient and doctor have their preferences
          of cardiopulmonary resuscitation), together with the perennial problem
                                                                 imprinted by society and need them to be adjusted from time to time by
          of limited resources, raised a set of very difficult considerations, such
                                                                 the overall good of society.
          as who should live, who should die, and who should decide?
                                                                   Paternalism,  as  the  opposite  of  the  informative  model,  often
            Such  positive  development  was  not  without  serious  abuse  of
                                                                 involves  some  form  of  interference  with  or  refusal  to  conform  to
          physician power, as is highlighted by the Tuskegee study. One of US
                                                                 patients’ preferences. “Paternalism, then, is the intentional overriding
          president  Bill  Clinton’s  more  convincing  apologies  in  recent  times
                                                                 of one person’s known preferences or actions by another person, where
          was that made on 16 May 1997, for the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis
                                                                 the person who overrides justifies the action by the goal of benefitting
          Study.  From  1932  to  1972,  hundreds  of  poor  black  farm  workers
                                                                 or avoiding harm to the person whose will is overridden.”
                                                                                                           1
          with syphilis were deliberately left untreated, with the supposed goal
                                                                   Within the African context, paternalism has hardly been contested.
          of  studying  the  natural  history  of  the  disease.  Participants  received
                                                                 It is still common and easy for physicians to ignore and neglect patient
          free food and transportation to encourage them to join a study they
                                                                 autonomy. Apart from the cultural divide and lack of exposure to each
          were told was aimed at curing their “bad blood”. In fact, government
                                                                 other’s value systems, there is an underlying assumption that medical
          officials  went  to  inordinate  lengths  over  the  decades  to  ensure  that
                                                                 knowledge  and  technology  could  be  too  complex  to  understand  for
          these  men  received  no  treatment  at  all,  even  after  the  discovery  of
                                                                 patients in general, and African patients in particular. Patients easily
          penicillin. It is inexplicable that such a study went on for more than
                                                                 develop  unrealistic  expectations  of  modern  medicine  and  adopt  a
          40 years (1930–1970), even after a treatment for syphilis was found.
                                                                 cowed role, trusting their doctors’ expertise unconditionally.
          It  is  unlikely,  even  after  the  Nuremberg  Code  and  the  Universal
                                                                   We suggest that the dichotomy between autonomy and paternalism
          Declaration of Human Rights (1948), that people would be safe from
                                                                 be  abandoned  altogether  to  favour  a  model  of  deliberation  wherein
          unethical research practices.
                                                                 patient  and  physician  interact,  share  and  finally  make  the  decision
            Recent  research  on  male  circumcision  as  a  prevention  of  human
                                                                 together.  Both  parties  ought  to  accept  moral  responsibility  to  arrive
          immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
                                                                 at a decision. Such a solution is more than just the consensus of two
          in  South  Africa,  Kenya,  and  Uganda)  requires  assessment  of  the
                                                                 positions and suits the African context and philosophy of Ubuntu. The
          research outcome for the female partners of those men who were HIV
                                                                 deliberation  model  points  to  the  urgent  need  for  democratisation  of
          positive at the time of circumcision, to realise that a Tuskegee could
                                                                 Western medicine and its institutions.
          be  repeated.  It  has  been  suggested  that  the  female  partners  of  the
                                                                   Giving informed consent for a procedure on a child has its own set
          HIV-infected men who were circumcised had not been informed that
                                                                 of problems. It is morally advisable, if a child has the cognitive and
          they  were  part  of  a  study. The  outcome  of  the  study  as  reported  by
                  7
          Dr. Wawer,  showed that the HIV incidence of those female partners   emotional maturity to understand the situation, that his or her assent
                                                                 should be sought as well as the consent of the parents or legal proxy.
          increased by 60% over a period of two years.
                                                                 Parents,  however,  do  not  have  the  right  to  refuse  or  give  consent
                          Informed Consent                       to  surgical  procedures  if  doing  so  would  be  detrimental  or  of  no
          In  the  Western  world,  a  specific  style  of  conversation  between  the   immediate benefit to the child. Paediatric surgeons should be familiar
          patient  and  doctor  has  developed  whereby  the  patient  is  encouraged   with each country’s individual legislation.
          to take a more active, informed position within the decision-making   The  ethical  justification  of  informed  consent  is  respect  for  the
          process.  Some physicians, however, still point out that they can solve   patient’s and family’s autonomy and for the right of the patient or proxy
                8
          all difficult questions without discussing them with the patient or the   to make informed decisions. Informed consent is, therefore, one of our
          patient’s proxy by relying solely on their own professional expertise.   main duties as paediatric surgeons, and this usually means obtaining
          It is important, however, to be aware that professional expertise is not   parental consent.
          without  value  judgements.  Therefore,  the  physician-patient  relation-  Informed consent includes a three-tier cascade, each step presupposing
          ship has been described as an often-conflicting power dichotomy. An   the previous one.
          extreme on the side of patient autonomy denies any room for physician   1.  Determination  of  the  patient’s  competence  to  give  consent:
          decision making.  Such an extreme approach had been called the infor-  Competence  is  a  prerequisite  to  be  able  to  give  informed  consent.
                      9
          mative,  or  engineering,  model  of  the  patient-physician  relationship,   A competent patient needs to be able to grasp the essentials of what
          whereby the “physician’s role is to disclose factual information about   is  explained,  to  think  rationally  and  logically,  and  to  come  to  an
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43