Page 81 - 51 the significance--29.2_opt
P. 81

5. The future of anti-diabetics in T2DM
            therapy






          Professor Ele Ferrannini          Dr Thomas Hach
          Department of Internal Medicine   TA Metabolism
          University of Pisa School of Medicine  Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
          Pisa, Italy                       Ingelheim, Germany

          Unmet needs in T2DM therapy

          As we have seen in Chapter 1, T2DM is a huge, global problem. Many
          treatments are available to tackle this chronic and potentially serious
          condition, but the fact is that, in many patients, long-term glycaemic
          control and adherence to therapies is far from optimal; limited by a
          lack of sustained efficacy, safety and tolerability issues and product
          label restrictions. These problems are compounded in those patients
          with comorbidities that interfere with diabetes therapy, such as renal
          impairment.


          Beyond HbA  in assessing treatment efficacy
                        1c
          Assessing the degree to which glycaemic control is achieved hinges on
          a number of parameters. If these targets are not met then glycaemia is
          considered to be uncontrolled. These targets are as follows:

          z  HbA : <7.0% 1
                1c
                                             2
          z  FPG: 3.9 – 7.2 mmol/L (70 – 130 mg/dl)
                                                                 3, 4
          z  2-hour postprandial blood glucose: <7.8 mmol/L (<140 mg/dl)  up to <10
            mmol/L (<180 mg/dl) 5

          As these targets indicate whether glycaemia is controlled or not, they
          relate directly to the efficacy of any given therapy in lowering blood
          glucose levels in patients with T2DM. For this reason, the level of effic-
          acy of any treatment will remain an important decision factor in choos-
          ing the most appropriate agent.
          HbA , as a proxy for efficacy, is the current gold standard in monitoring
              1c
          treatment and informing management decisions in people with diabe-
          tes.  However, using this measure in isolation is not without its limitations.
             6
                                                                             6
          HbA  reflects the mean blood glucose level during the preceding six
              1c
          to eight weeks, but this is true only for the population as a whole, not
          the individual patient.  For assessing the efficacy of a given treatment
                               6
          in the future we should take a more holistic approach. It is known that
          about 33% of people diagnosed as having T2DM based on postprandial
          (PPG) hyperglycaemia have normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG). It
                                                                           7
          has been shown that the deleterious effects of dysglycaemia – daily
          excursions in FPG and PPG – develop before diabetes is diagnosed.
                                                                           8
                                          81
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86