Page 74 - Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary
P. 74

Health Literacy, eHealth, and Communication: Putting the Consumer First: Workshop Summary


            PAneL

            seeing a patient for the first time who finds no allergies listed on the plan
            may want to know if the patient really has no allergies or if the patient
            has just not yet filled out that section of the Shared Care Plan. It often
            takes patients several sittings to fill out the entire plan which means that
            there will often be varying levels of completion. The design has to allow
            patients to check a box that explicitly states that the patient has no known
            allergies so that the answer is not ambiguous to the clinicians.
               There were numerous challenges encountered in designing the sys-
            tem. One set of challenges related to privacy and security. How, for exam-
            ple, can one design the system to safely provide patients access to their
            private health care information over the Internet, yet still allow needed
            information to be shared in an emergency situation? Other issues in this
            area  included  how  clinicians  would  log  in  and  how  usage  would  be
            audited.
               The Shared Care Plan was designed so patients can explicitly give
            view-only or fully-edit access to their care team members (see Figure 4-3).
            In Whatcom County about 99 percent of the physicians participate in the
            local health care network which means that patients can easily look up
            their various local health care providers and add them to their care teams.
            Patients can invite family members and friends to be part of their care
            team as well by using the invitation mechanism. Patients are the ones who
            determine who is on their care team.
               Providing appropriate emergency access was another issue in the area
            of privacy and security. In the situation illustrated in Figure 4-3, access
            is given to a group called Community Clinicians. This is a way to group
            all the community clinicians together whom the patient has not explicitly
            listed on the care team. By granting community clinicians access to the
            records, the patient is saying that anyone who needs to access the Shared
            Care Plan in an emergency may have access. Alternatively, patients can
            also block access to anyone who is not explicitly listed on the care team.
               Figure 4-4 illustrates the privacy flag feature. In this example, a patient
            is adding a new diagnosis (sleep apnea) to the diagnosis list. At the bot-
            tom of every record that the patient adds to the Shared Care Plan, there is
            the privacy flag indicated by a padlock icon. When the patient checks the
            box by the padlock, the team list is displayed at the bottom of the page
            and the patient decides who will be able to access that diagnosis. This was
            a feature that patients requested. Patients did not want a blanket yes/no
            setting for access to a record for the entire care team; they wanted instead
            to decide which individuals on the care team would have access.
               The  system  also  produces  a  summary  of  who  has  accessed  the
            record, the health care facility and department of those who accessed
            the record, and the date on which the access occurred. Patients can view
            that summary access screen at any time. If the patient sees something






                 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79