Page 106 - An Evidence Review of Active Surveillance in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
P. 106

Table 8. Monitoring criteria in protocols of observational management strategies with palliative intent in chronological order of starting
 enrollment year (continued)
 Center,   Monitoring   PSA   Gleason   # biopsy cores  Imaging   Behavioral   Additional   Triggers for interventions
 Country   schedule   score   /% cores   indication   laboratory
 [Pubmed ID]                       tests
 Enrollment
 years
 Royal Marsden   Every 6 mo PSA   √   –   –   –   –   –   Symptomatic prostate cancer
 Hospital, UK 112    and DRE                         progression
 [15839912]

 1993-2002
 PIVOT, US  146    Every 6 mo PSA   √   –   –   Bone scan   –   –   Discouraged treatment for
 [18783735]   every 5 yr                             asymptomatic progression
                                                     (eg, per PSA)
 1994-2002
 Watchful   Every 3 mo PSA   √   –   –   –   –   –   Developing progressive
 Waiting Study,                                      disease
 US 147
 [14501381]

 1998-2003
 Hospitals in   Every 6 mo PSA   >50   –   –   All patients   –   –   Hormonal manipulation was
 Manchester,   underwent                             demanded by the protocol
 UK 148    “multiple bone                            when the PSA rose to 50
 [11711356]   scans” (all                            ng/mL.
    negative),
 NR
 Univ. of Florida,   Every 3 mo PSA   √   –   –   –   –   –   Cancer progresses or
 US 149    and DRE;                                  symptoms become imminent.
 [18263992]   Repeat biopsy
    about 6 mo after
 2003-2006   the initial
 diagnosis.
 WW = watchful waiting; EM = expectant management; NR = not reported; DT = doubling time; mo = month(s); PAP = prostate acid phosphatase; PSA = prostate specific antigen;
 TRUS = Transrectal ultrasound; CT = computerized tomography; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; TNM = tumor-node-metastasis system; US = ultrasound; yr = year(s); ED =
 erectile dysfunction; SPCG-4 = Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4; PIVOT = Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial; VA = Veterans Affairs
 √ = item was used as part of monitoring strategy but explicit criteria were not defined
 – = item was not used or not reported as part of monitoring strategy
 a  Local progression was defined as a palpable transcapsular tumor growth; symptoms of obstruction of the flow of urine that necessitated intervention, or both.
 b  Local progression was defined as symptoms (subjective), increase in T category, increase in prostate size on DRE by 25%, or increase in ultrasound measured volume >40%.







 55
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111