Page 89 - 16Neonatal Jaundice_compressed
P. 89

Neonatal jaundice





                         bilirubin risk zones (> 95th centile to  < 40th centile), sensitivity increased but  neither test
                         could  predict hyperbilirubinaemia with more than 98%  sensitivity without seriously
                         compromising specificity (13% for risk factor score, 21% for serum bilirubin risk zone). [EL II]
                         In the last study, from the USA,  the predictive accuracy of clinical risk factors, pre-discharge
                                                     14
                         bilirubin levels expressed  as risk zones, and a combination of pre-discharge bilirubin and
                         additional risk factors  was evaluated prospectively.  Study methodology and population is
                         described in detail in Chapter 3 on risk factors. All babies (n = 812) had pre-discharge bilirubin
                         measured before 52 hours of age with daily transcutaneous bilirubin readings from the forehead
                         using  BiliChek, and these  were recorded on the hour-specific nomogram. Bilirubin levels
                         (transcutaneous bilirubin or serum bilirubin) were also measured on day 3–5 in all babies either
                         in hospital or at home. If transcutaneous bilirubin readings exceeded the 75th centile or were
                         ≥ 205 micromol/litre, blood samples were taken for laboratory serum bilirubin measurement.
                         Both the transcutaneous bilirubin and serum bilirubin readings were expressed as risk zones on
                         the hour-specific nomogram. In cases where both transcutaneous bilirubin and serum bilirubin
                         levels were measured in the same baby, the serum bilirubin readings were used for the final
                         analysis. Information on clinical risk factors  was extracted from hospital records, and their
                         association with hyperbilirubinaemia assessed using  univariate analysis. The variable most
                         strongly associated with an increased risk of hyperbilirubinaemia was the pre-discharge bilirubin
                         level. As this was included in a separate model, the final clinical risk model included five other
                         factors: gestational age, gender, intended method of feeding, black race and extent of jaundice.
                         Using logistic regression modelling, the accuracy of three tests was compared for the prediction
                         of significant hyperbilirubinaemia. In all, 6.4%  of  babies developed hyperbilirubinaemia,
                         (bilirubin levels on day  3–5  exceeding  or within 17 micromol/litre  of the hour-specific AAP
                         phototherapy treatment thresholds). The predictive accuracy of pre-discharge bilirubin risk zone
                         assignment was not significantly different from that of multiple risk factors (c-statistic 0.88 versus
                         0.91). After combining clinical risk factors with pre-discharge bilirubin risk zone assignment, the
                         only factors that remained  statistically significant were gestational age and percentage weight
                         loss per day. This combination model showed improved predictive accuracy (c-statistic 0.96)
                         when compared with the pre-discharge bilirubin levels. [EL II]

                         Evidence summary
                         Results from two studies with EL II indicate that pre-discharge serum bilirubin plotted on hour-
                         specific percentile charts  (‘nomograms’) shows  good accuracy in predicting subsequent
                         hyperbilirubinaemia.  The  studies  used  different  threshold  values  and  definitions  of
                         hyperbilirubinaemia. In one study,  two consecutive serum bilirubin readings plotted on the
                         nomogram had greater predictive accuracy than a single measurement. Another study with EL I
                         indicated that pre-discharge transcutaneous bilirubin plotted on an ‘hour-specific’ nomogram of
                         bilirubin levels generated from a study of healthy babies could predict hyperbilirubinaemia with
                         100% sensitivity and 88% specificity. The threshold values for defining hyperbilirubinaemia
                         were different for the transcutaneous (≥ 75th centile) and serum (≥ 95th centile) bilirubin
                         levels. Other studies have compared the predictive accuracy of clinical risk index scores with
                         pre-discharge bilirubin levels. Their results suggest that pre-discharge bilirubin is more accurate
                         in predicting subsequent hyperbilirubinaemia than clinical risk factors alone, but the best results
                         are seen when pre-discharge bilirubin measurement is combined with risk factors. A major
                         limitation of the evidence is that the hour-specific bilirubin nomogram was devised using a
                         small population of babies in a single city, and that babies with conditions such as ABO
                         incompatibility  were  excluded. The nomogram may  not, therefore, be applicable to other
                         populations of newborn infants. Similar nomograms need to be devised for other populations.

                         GDG translation from evidence
                         Current evidence suggests  that it is possible to identify babies  who  are likely to  develop
                         significant hyperbilirubinaemia  using a  pre-discharge  assessment. The GDG considered that
                         assessment of risk factors was important.

                         Another approach has been based on hour-specific bilirubin estimation. Hour-specific bilirubin
                         levels were interpreted using a nomogram such as that devised by Bhutani  et al.,  but  the
                         universal application of hour-specific bilirubin estimation could not be relied on as data were


              60
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94