Page 22 - 15Diarrhoeaandvomiting
P. 22

Glossary of terms




                                         of  pain.  In  health  care,  qualitative  techniques  have  been  commonly  used
                                         in  research  documenting  the  experience  of  chronic  illness  and  in  studies
                                         about  the  functioning  of  organisations.  Qualitative  research  techniques  such
                                         as  focus  groups  and  in-depth  interviews  have  been  used  in  one-off  projects
                                         commissioned by guideline development groups to find out more about the
                                         views and experiences of patients and carers.
               Quality-adjusted life years  A measure of health outcome which looks at both length of life and quality of life.
               (QALYs)                   QALYs  are  calculated  by  estimating  the  years  of  life  remaining  for  a  patient
                                         following a particular care pathway and weighting each year with a quality of
                                         life score (on a 0 to 1 scale). 1 QALY is equal to 1 year of life in perfect health,
                                         or 2 years at 50% health, and so on.
               Quantitative research     Research  that  generates  numerical  data  or  data  that  can  be  converted  into
                                         numbers, for example clinical trials or the national Census that counts people
                                         and households.
               Quasi-random allocation    A  method  of  assigning  or  allocating  participants  in  an  experimental  study
                                         whereby the assignment of patients to treatment and comparison groups is not
                                         done randomly, or patients are not given equal probabilities of selection. For
                                         example, participants may be assigned to the groups based on their date of birth
                                         or day of the week or every alternate person. These methods lead to selection
                                         bias in a study. See also random allocation.
               Random allocation         A  method  that  uses  the  play  of  chance  to  assign  participants  or  units  to
                                         comparison groups in an experimental study, for example by using a random
                                         numbers table or a computer-generated random sequence. Random allocation
                                         implies that each individual (or each unit in the case of cluster randomisation)
                                         being entered into a study has the same chance of receiving each of the possible
                                         interventions. See also quasi-random allocation.
               Randomisation             The process of randomly allocating participants into comparison groups in a
                                         controlled trial. The aim of this process is to ensure that the experimental and
                                         the control groups are similar with respect to all potential confounding variables
                                         except the treatment or intervention being investigated.
               Randomised controlled trial  An experimental study to test a specific drug or other treatment in which people are
               (RCT)                     randomly  allocated  to  two  (or  more)  groups:  one  (the  intervention  or
                                         experimental group) receiving the treatment that is being tested, and the other
                                         (the comparison or control group) receiving an alternative treatment, a placebo
                                         (dummy treatment) or no treatment. The two groups are followed up to compare
                                         differences in outcomes to see how effective the experimental treatment was.
               Receiver operating        A curve representing the relationship between sensitivity (true positive fraction
               characteristic curve      and 1 − specificity (false positive fraction) in the case of a continous test result. It
               (ROC curve)               displays the trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity when the cut-off value
                                         for a positive test result is varied. The measure used to determine the overall
                                         accuracy of a test using the ROC curve is known as the area under ROC curve
                                         (AROC). In general, an AROC of 0.5–0.7 is associated with a marginally useful
                                         test, of 0.7–0.9 with a good test, and of greater than 0.9 with an excellent test.
               Red flag symptoms and signs Important symptoms or signs of dehydration whose presence is associated with
                                         a risk of progression to shock.
               Remote assessment         An assessment carried out when the patient is geographically remote from the
                                         assessor (e.g. via telephone) such that physical examination is not possible.
               Regression analysis       A statistical technique used to predict the effect or influence of one or more
                                         independent factors/variables on a dependent factor/variable, for example the
                                         effect of age, smoking and occupation on the incidence of lung cancer. Logistic
                                         regression and meta-regression are two types of regression analysis.
               Relative risk or risk ratio   The ratio of the risks of a given event or outcome (e.g. an adverse reaction to the
               (RR)                      drug being tested) in one group of subjects compared with another group. When
                                         the ‘risk’ of the event is the same in the two groups, the relative risk is 1. In a
                                         study comparing two treatments, a relative risk of 2 would indicate that patients
                                         receiving one of the treatments had twice the risk of an undesirable outcome
                                         than those receiving the other treatment.




                                                                                                          xix
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27