Page 136 - 15Diarrhoeaandvomiting
P. 136

Other therapies




                           the duration of the intervention varied from 2 to 6 days among six studies, and the remaining
                           three did not report such information. Participants were children aged between 1 and 60 months,
                           and were inpatients and/or outpatients. Definitions for the outcome measures and the resolution
                           of diarrhoea were different among the studies. The methodological quality and conduct of the
                           studies  were  not  uniform. An  adequate  generation  of  the  allocation  sequence  was  reported
                           only for three trials and the allocation concealment was appropriate only in one. Three trials
                           were double-blinded and in only five was an intention-to-treat analysis performed. Data were
                           extracted for the following outcomes: duration of diarrhoea, frequency of stools, vomiting and
                           adverse events. The review also reported the proportion of patients without diarrhoea by days 3
                           and 5 as well as the proportion of those presenting diarrhoea for more than 7 days. All the trials
                           had better than 80% follow-up. [EL = 1+]

                           Data from six trials (1076 patients) were pooled in a meta-analysis that showed a statistically
                           significant  reduction  in  the  duration  of  diarrhoea  when  smectite  was  administered
                           (WMD  −22.7  hours;  95%  CI  −24.8  to  −20.6  hours). Two  studies  that  provided  data  on  the
                           number  of  stools  were  pooled.  No  statistically  significant  difference  was  found  between  the
                           intervention and the control group in the number of stools during the first 24 hours of follow-up.
                           However, children treated with smectite had a statistically significant reduction in the number
                           of stools from the first 24 hour period onwards: at 24 to 48 hours WMD −0.62; 95% CI −1.0 to
                           −0.2), and at 48 to 72 hours WMD −0.58; 95% CI −0.9 to −0.3). The reviewers pooled the data
                           from four trials together, finding that by day 3 the proportion of children treated with smectite and
                           without diarrhoea was statistically significantly higher than the proportion of children that were
                           not treated with smectite and were without diarrhoea (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.36 to 31.98). When
                           results were pooled using a fixed effects model, statistically significantly more children treated
                           with smectite (122/128) were cured by day 5 compared with those receiving placebo (106/126)
                           (RR 1.24 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.42). However, as significant heterogeneity was observed (χ² = 8.01;
                           P = 0.02; I² = 75%), the reviewers also presented results using a random effects model, where
                           the difference was not statistically significant (RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.53). A funnel plot and
                           regression asymmetry test (P = 0.23 and the 95% CI included 0) did not show any publication or
                           other small-sample bias.
                           One trial showed a reduction in the risk of having diarrhoea for more than 7 days for those
                           children receiving smectite when compared with the control group (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.42 to
                           0.85). No statistically significant difference in the number of vomiting episodes between the
                           two groups was found when the results of two studies were combined. One RCT reported the
                           duration of vomiting and showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
                           Another trial found no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups for the
                           incidence of vomiting on day 1 and or on day 3 of the intervention. No statistically significant
                           differences in adverse events associated with treatments were identified and three RCTs reported
                           no adverse events associated with short-term treatment with smectite.


                           Evidence summary
                           There was evidence from a well-conducted systematic review [EL = 1+] for the effectiveness of
                           smectite in the treatment of children with diarrhoea. The review showed that children receiving
                           smectite  had  a  reduction  in  the  frequency  and  duration  of  diarrhoea,  experienced  a  higher
                           resolution of diarrhoea by day 3 and were less likely to have diarrhoea for more than 7 days. On
                           the other hand, the review showed no statistically significant differences between the smectite
                           group and the control group in the number of episodes or duration of vomiting or in the resolution
                           of diarrhoea by day 5. Statistically significant differences in adverse effects between the smectite
                           and control groups were not reported and some trials reported that no adverse events occurred.

               8.2.2       Antisecretory agents
                           Evidence overview

                           Two  randomised  placebo-controlled  trials  of  racecadotril 169,170   and  three  trials  of  BSS  were
                           identified. 171–173






                                                                                                         111
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141