Page 237 - Pagetit
P. 237

NEUROSCIENCE OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCE USE AND DEPENDENCE





                     Note of clarification on Paragraph 29
                     The WMA hereby reaffirms its position that extreme care must be taken in making
                     use of a placebo-controlled trial and that in general this methodology should only
                     be used in the absence of existing proven therapy. However, a placebo-controlled
                     trial may be ethically acceptable, even if proven therapy is available, under the
                     following circumstances:
                     — Where for compelling and scientifically sound methodological reasons its use
                        is necessary to determine the efficacy or safety of a prophylactic, diagnostic
                        or therapeutic method; or
                     — Where a prophylactic, diagnostic or therapeutic method is being investigated
                        for a minor condition and the patients who receive placebo will not be subject
                        to any additional risk of serious or irreversible harm.
                     All other provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki must be adhered to, especially
                     the need for appropriate ethical and scientific review.
                     1  The Declaration of Helsinki is an official policy document of the World Medical Association,
                     the global representative body for physicians. It was first adopted in 1964 (Helsinki, Finland)
                     and revised in 1975 (Tokyo, Japan), 1983 (Venice, Italy), 1989 (Hong Kong), 1996
                     (Sommerset-West, South Africa) and 2000 (Edinburgh, Scotland). Note of clarification on
                     Paragraph 29 added by the WMA General Assembly, Washington, 2002.
                     Source: World Medical Association, 2002 (available on web site http://www.wma.net/e/
                     policy17-e_e.html).





                   Principles of biomedical ethics
                   i. Respect for autonomy
                   Respecting autonomy means that people respect and do not interfere with
                   the actions of rational persons that have a capacity for autonomous action,
                   that is, adults who are able to freely decide upon a course of action without
                   influence, coercion or force (Beauchamp & Childress, 2001). In the context
                   of biomedical research, the principle of respect for autonomy is usually taken
                   to require the following: informed consent to treatment or research
                   participation, voluntariness in research participation, and maintenance of
                   confidentiality  and privacy of information provided to a researcher
                   (Beauchamp & Childress, 2001).


                   ii. Non-maleficence
                   The principle of non-maleficence simply means, do no harm (Beauchamp
                   & Childress, 2001). Following the principle of non-maleficence requires
                   people to refrain from causing harm or injury, or from placing others at risk
                   of harm or injury. In the context of biomedical research, the principle of non-


                                                  216




          Chapter_7                216                             19.1.2004, 11:50
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242