Page 142 - 80 guidelines for the treatment of malaria_opt
P. 142

nd
              Guidelines for the treatment of malaria – 2  edition


            a6.3.3  spread of resistance
            Several mathematical models have been devised to examine the spread of antimalarial
            drug resistance (10,15,18,19). Spread of resistance is determined by the reproductive
            advantage conferred by the resistance mechanism. This derives from the increased
            gametocyte carriage associated with treatment failure (both from the primary infection
            and from the subsequent recrudescences), the “donors”, and the selective pressure from
            residual concentrations of slowly eliminated antimalarial in potential recipients. A long
            elimination half-life results in long periods of post-treatment chemoprophylaxis.
            Resistance encoded by multiple mutations at a single locus may occur in two overlapping
            phases: Phase 1 where the drug is better tolerated by the parasites, but the therapeutic
            doses still usually clear the infection; and Phase 2 where clinical failures start to occur.
            This second phase is very rapid, and it is essential that surveillance programmes are in
            place and capable of monitoring the change from the first to the second phase. Phase 1
            may occur faster, in areas of high transmission, but the subsequent phase is slower.
            Combination therapy significantly slows the rate of evolution of resistance, but it should
            be instigated before significant resistance to either component is present.










            a6.4  prevention of resistance by use of combination therapy

            The theory underlying combination treatment of tuberculosis, leprosy and HIV infection
            is well known, and it has recently been applied to malaria (4,5,18,20–23). If two drugs with
            different modes of action and, therefore, different resistance mechanisms are used in
            combination, then the per-parasite probability of developing resistance to both drugs is
            the product of their individual per-parasite probabilities.
            For example, if the per-parasite probabilities of developing resistance to drug A and drug
            B are both 1 in 1012, then a simultaneously resistant mutant will arise spontaneously in
            1 in 1024 parasites. As it is postulated that there are approximately 1017 parasites in the
            entire world, and a cumulative total of less than 1020 in one year, such a simultaneously
            resistant parasite would arise spontaneously roughly once every 10 000 years – provided
            the drugs always confronted the parasites in combination. Thus, the lower the de novo
            per-parasite probability of developing resistance, the greater the delay in the emergence
            of resistance.
            Stable resistance to the artemisinin derivatives has not yet been identified, and cannot
            yet be induced in the laboratory, which suggests that it may be very rare indeed. De novo

   128
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147