Page 100 - HIV/AIDS Guidelines
P. 100

Assessment of Immunologic Failure. CD4 count should be confirmed by repeat testing. Concomitant
            medications should be reviewed carefully, with a focus on those known to decrease white blood cells or,
            specifically, CD4 T-cells (e.g., cancer chemotherapy, interferon, prednisone, ZDV; combination of TDF and
            ddI), and consideration should be given to substituting or discontinuing these drugs, if possible. Untreated
            coinfections (e.g., HIV-2, HTLV-1, HTLV-2) and serious medical conditions (e.g., malignancy) also should
            be considered. In many cases, no obvious cause for immunologic failure can be identified.

            Management of Immunologic Failure. No consensus exists on when or how to treat immunologic failure.
            Given the risk of clinical events, it is reasonable to focus on patients with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm 3
            because patients with higher CD4 counts have a lower risk of clinical events. It is not clear that immunologic
            failure in the setting of virologic suppression should prompt a change in the ARV regimen. Because ongoing
            immune activation occurs in some patients with suppressed HIV RNA levels, some have suggested adding a
            drug to an existing regimen. However, this strategy does not result in clear virologic or immunologic
                   58
            benefit. Others suggest changing the regimen to another regimen (e.g., from NNRTI-based to PI-based,
            INSTI-based, or CCR5 antagonist-based regimens), but this strategy has not shown clear benefit.

            An immune-based therapy, interleukin-2, demonstrated CD4 count increases but no clinical benefit in two
                                   59
            large randomized studies and therefore is not recommended (AI). Other immune-based therapies (e.g., gene
            therapies, growth hormone, cyclosporine, interleukin-7) are under investigation. Currently, immune-based
            therapies should not be used unless in the context of a clinical trial (AIII).


            References

            1.  d'Arminio Monforte A, Lepri AC, Rezza G, et al. Insights into the reasons for discontinuation of the first highly active
               antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in a cohort of antiretroviral naive patients. I.CO.N.A. Study Group. Italian
               Cohort of Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. AIDS. 2000;14(5):499-507.
            2.  Mocroft A, Youle M, Moore A, et al. Reasons for modification and discontinuation of antiretrovirals: results from a
               single treatment centre. AIDS. 2001;15(2):185-194.
            3.  Paredes R, Lalama CM, Ribaudo HJ, et al. Pre-existing minority drug-resistant HIV-1 variants, adherence, and risk of
               antiretroviral treatment failure. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(5):662-671.
            4.  Schouten JT, Krambrink A, Ribaudo HJ, et al. Substitution of nevirapine because of efavirenz toxicity in AIDS clinical
               trials group A5095. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):787-791.
            5.  Waters L, Fisher M, Winston A, et al. A phase IV, double-blind, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study
               to assess the feasibility of switching individuals receiving efavirenz with continuing central nervous system adverse
               events to etravirine. AIDS. 2011;25(1):65-71.
            6.  Kieffer TL, Finucane MM, Nettles RE, et al. Genotypic analysis of HIV-1 drug resistance at the limit of detection: virus
               production without evolution in treated adults with undetectable HIV loads. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(8):1452-1465.
            7.  Shiu C, Cunningham CK, Greenough T, et al. Identification of ongoing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
               replication in residual viremia during recombinant HIV-1 poxvirus immunizations in patients with clinically undetectable
               viral loads on durable suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2009;83(19):9731-9742.

            8.  Siliciano JD, Kajdas J, Finzi D, et al. Long-term follow-up studies confirm the stability of the latent reservoir for HIV-1
               in resting CD4+ T cells. Nat Med. 2003;9(6):727-728.

            9.  Eron JJ, Cooper DA, Steigbigel RT, et al. Sustained antiretroviral effect of raltegravir at week 156 in the BENCHMRK
               studies, and exploratory analysis of late outcomes based on early virologic responses. Paper presented at: 17th
               Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; February 16-19, 2010; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 515.
            10. Taiwo B, Gallien S, Aga S, et al. HIV drug resistance evolution during persistent near-target viral suppression. Antiviral
               Therapy 2010;15:A38.


            Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents         H-7

                            Downloaded from http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines on 12/8/2012 EST.
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105