Page 451 - untitled
P. 451


                              D
                                 DISSENTING STATEMENTISSENTING STATEMENT
         Commission focused thousands of staff hours on investigation, and not nearly
         enough on analyzing these critical economic questions. The investigations were in
         many cases productive and informative, but there should have been more balance be-
         tween investigation and analysis.

         Conclusions:

           • The credit bubble was an essential cause of the financial crisis.
           • Global capital flows lowered the price of capital in the United States and much
             of Europe.
           • Over time, investors lowered the return they required for risky investments.
             Their preferences may have changed, they may have adopted an irrational bub-
             ble mentality, or they may have mistakenly assumed that the world had become
             safer. This inflated prices for risky assets.
           • U.S. monetary policy may have contributed to the credit bubble but did not
             cause it.


                                THE HOUSING BUBBLE
         The housing bubble had two components: the actual homes and the mortgages that
         financed them. We look briefly at each component and its possible causes.
           There was a housing bubble in the United States—the price of U.S. housing in-
         creased by more than could be explained by market developments. This included
         both a national housing bubble and more concentrated regional bubbles in four
         “Sand States”: California, Nevada, Arizona, and Florida.
           Conventional wisdom is that a bubble is hard to spot while you’re in one, and
         painfully obvious after it has burst. Even after the U.S. housing bubble burst, there is
         no consensus on what caused it.
           While we still don’t know the relative importance of the possible causes of the
         housing bubble, we can at least identify some of the most important hypotheses:

           • Population growth. Arizona, Florida, Nevada, and parts of California all expe-
             rienced population growth that far exceeded the national average. More people
             fueled more demand for houses.
           • Land use restrictions. In some areas, local zoning rules and other land use re-
             strictions, as well as natural barriers to building, made it hard to build new
             houses to meet increased demand resulting from population growth. When
             supply is constrained and demand increases, prices go up.
           • Over-optimism. Even absent market fundamentals driving up prices, shared
             expectations of future price increases can generate booms. This is the classic
             explanation of a bubble.
           • Easy financing. Nontraditional (and higher risk) mortgages made it easier for
             potential homebuyers to borrow enough to buy more expensive homes. This
             doesn’t mean they could afford those homes or future mortgage payments in
   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456