Page 362 - untitled
P. 362

SEPTEMBER : THE BANKRUPTCY OF LEHMAN                          


            At : P.M., Fed officials circulated the outline of a plan to create a “Lehman De-
         fault Management Group,” a group of Lehman counterparties and creditors who
         would make plans to cope with a Lehman bankruptcy. They would agree to hold off
         on fully exercising their rights to close out their trades with Lehman; instead, they
         would establish a process to “net down”—that is, reduce—all exposures using a com-
                            
         mon valuation method. A little before midnight on Thursday, Boesky notified col-
         leagues that panicked hedge funds had called to say they were “expecting [a] full
         blown recession” and that there was a “full expectation that Leh goes, wamu and then
         ML [Merrill Lynch].” They were “ALL begging, pleading for a large scale solution
         which spans beyond just LEH.” Boesky compared the level of panic to the failure of
         Bear Stearns—“On a scale of  to , where  is Bear-Stearns-week-panic, I would
         put sentiment today at a .” 
            At almost the same time, JP Morgan demanded that Lehman post another  bil-
         lion in cash “by the opening of business tomorrow in New York”; if it didn’t, JP Mor-
                                                            
         gan would “exercise our right to decline to extend credit to you.” JP Morgan CEO
         Dimon, President Black, and CRO Zubrow had first made the demand in a phone
         call earlier that evening to Lehman CEO Fuld, CFO Ian Lowitt, and Treasurer Paolo
                
         Tonucci. Tonucci told the JP Morgan executives on the call that Lehman could not
         meet the demand. Dimon said Lehman’s difficulties in coming up with the money
         were not JP Morgan’s problem, Tonucci told the FCIC. “They just wanted the cash.
         We made the point that it’s too much cash to mobilize. There was no give on that.
         Again, they said ‘that’s not our problem, we just want the cash.’” When Tonucci
                                                             
         asked what would keep JP Morgan from asking for  billion tomorrow, Dimon
         replied, “Nothing, maybe we will.” 
            Under normal circumstances, Tonucci would not have tolerated this treatment,
         but circumstances were far from normal. “JPM as ‘clearing bank’ continues to ask for
         more cash collateral. If we don’t provide the cash, they refuse to clear, we fail,” was the
         message circulated in an email to Lehman executives on Friday, September . So
         Lehman “delivered the  billion in cash only by pulling virtually every unencum-
         bered asset it could deliver.” 
            JP Morgan’s Zubrow saw it differently. He told the FCIC that the previously
         posted . billion of collateral by Lehman was “inappropriate” because it was “illiq-
         uid” and “could not be reasonably valued.” Moreover, Zubrow said the potential col-
                                            
         lateral shortfall was greater than  billion. Lehman’s former CEO, Fuld, told the
         FCIC that he agreed to post the  billion because JP Morgan said it would be re-
         turned to Lehman at the close of business the following day. The Lehman bank-
                                                          
         ruptcy estate made the same allegation. This dispute is now the subject of litigation;
         the Lehman bankruptcy estate is suing JP Morgan to retrieve the  billion—and the
         original . billion. 


                                 “HEADS OF FAMILY”
         Should Lehman be allowed to go bankrupt? Within the government, sentiments var-
         ied. On Friday morning, as Secretary Paulson headed to New York to “sort through
   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367