Page 285 - untitled
P. 285

14



                        LATE 2007 TO EARLY 2008:
                     BILLIONS IN SUBPRIME LOSSES







                                     CONTENTS

              Merrill Lynch: “Dawning awareness over the course of the summer”.................
              Citigroup: “That would not in any way have excited my attention”...................
              AIG’s dispute with Goldman: “There could never be losses”...............................
              Federal Reserve: “The discount window wasn’t working”...................................
              Monoline insurers: “We never expected losses”...................................................



         While a handful of banks were bailing out their money market funds and commer-
         cial paper programs in the fall of , the financial sector faced a larger problem:
         billions of dollars in mortgage-related losses on loans, securities, and derivatives,
         with no end in sight. Among U.S. firms, Citigroup and Merrill Lynch reported the
         most spectacular losses, largely because of their extensive collateralized debt obliga-
         tion (CDO) businesses, writing down a total of . billion and . billion, re-
         spectively, by the end of the year. Billions more in losses were reported by large
         financial institutions such as Bank of America (. billion), Morgan Stanley (.
                                                            
         billion), JP Morgan (. billion), and Bear Stearns (. billion). Insurance compa-
         nies, hedge funds, and other financial institutions collectively had taken additional
         mortgage-related losses of about  billion. 
           The large write-downs strained these firms’ capital and cash reserves. Further,
         market participants began discriminating between firms perceived to be relatively
         healthy and others about which they were not so sure. Bear Stearns and Lehman
         Brothers were at the top of the “suspect” list; by year-end  the cost of five-year
         protection against default on their obligations in the credit default swap market stood
         at, respectively, , and , annually for every  million, while the cost
         for the relatively stronger Goldman Sachs stood at ,. 
           Meanwhile, the economy was beginning to show signs of stress. Facing turmoil in
         financial markets, declining home prices, and oil prices above  a barrel, consumer
         spending was slowing. The Federal Reserve lowered the overnight bank borrowing
         rate from . earlier in the year to . in September, . in October, and then
         . in December.
         
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290