Page 282 - 20dynamics of cancer
P. 282

STEM CELLS: TISSUE RENEWAL                                  267

                              once off the template with one new mutation. At the steady state, the
                              transit lineage always receives a strand copied from the template that
                              carries one new mutation; replication in the transit cell adds another
                              mutation.
                                Figure 12.10b shows the opposite pattern, in which the newest strand
                              always segregates to the stem lineage along the bottom. The newer
                              strand always has one additional mutation, so the stem lineage accrues
                              one new mutation in each generation.
                                By the standard view of DNA replication and mitosis, strands segre-
                              gate randomly to daughter cells. If so, then the pattern by which muta-
                              tions accumulate would follow a stochastic process between case (a), in
                              which the stem lineage always gets the older strand, and (b), in which
                              the stem lineage always gets the newer strand. Stochastic segregation
                              would, on average, cause mutations to accumulate in the stem lineage
                              at one-half the rate at which mutations arise on newly copied strands.
                                Cairns (1975) called the pattern in Figure 12.10a “immortal strand-
                              ing.” Any tendency away from purely random segregation and toward
                              immortal stranding would lower the rate at which mutations accumulate
                              in the stem line.
                                Immortal stranding requires asymmetric stem cell division, in which
                              the fate of the daughters is determined during mitosis, before segrega-
                              tion occurs. Any evidence for immortal stranding also provides evidence
                              for asymmetric stem cell division.
                                Several recent studies support Cairns’ hypothesis of immortal strand-
                              ing in stem cell lineages.  Potten et al. (2002) marked DNA strands
                              in mouse small intestine crypts with tritiated thymidine, then labeled
                              newly synthesized strands with a different label, bromodeoxyuridine.
                              Over time, only a few cells in crypt positions 3–7 retained the initial la-
                              bel; those cell positions delineate the crypt location in which stem cells
                              reside (Figure 12.7). When the second label was removed, the putative
                              stem cells that retained tritiated thymidine lost the second label, bro-
                              modeoxyuridine, showing that those cells did pass through the mitotic
                              cycle.
                                Smith (2005) similarly showed that cells with stem lineage properties
                              in mouse mammary glands retain immortal strands through epithelial
                              tissue renewal.
                                Studies of asymmetrically dividing cells in tissue culture also demon-
                              strate conditions under which immortal stranding occurs (Merok et al.
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287